{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74","short_pith_number":"pith:JHBDNI33","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"49c236a37b3968253c343f69f6df12ff254dabf0ab84a162f9c810b8a3fdbb36","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1708.02543","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Impossibility of $n-1$-strong-equllibrium for Distributed Consensus with Rational Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.DC","authors_text":"Amit Jacob Fanani, Itay Harel","submitted_at":"2017-08-08T16:15:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"An algorithm for $n-1$-strong-equillibrium for distributed consensus in a ring with rational agents was proposed by Afek et al. (2014). A proof of impossibility of $n-1$-strong-equillibrium for distributed consensus in every topology with rational agents, when $n$ is even, is presented. Furthermore, we show that the algorithm proposed by Afek et al. is the only algorithm which can solve the problem when $n$ is odd. Finally, we prove that the proposed algorithm provides a $n-2$-strong-equillibrium in a synchronous ring when $n$ is even."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1708.02543","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DC","submitted_at":"2017-08-08T16:15:05Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"0c2a9a0c2d9dbe88a65ef93cb4036bd4a2b0e6fa16b91d29c98382deef6cf668","abstract_canon_sha256":"d94b4d6331d404c1eab8c2cecfa7cbee88d977f870e7be2de2d8115b820f11bf"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:37:58.410293Z","signature_b64":"C4acIXgShmqKQ4mFqa3uXWwhy2n2ER5pyrL6/roVWg1Cqt3oRLpAzt819xa61oMZxoccHR/zKuZcsRKApGc1Bw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"49c236a37b3968253c343f69f6df12ff254dabf0ab84a162f9c810b8a3fdbb36","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:37:58.409870Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:37:58.409870Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Impossibility of $n-1$-strong-equllibrium for Distributed Consensus with Rational Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.DC","authors_text":"Amit Jacob Fanani, Itay Harel","submitted_at":"2017-08-08T16:15:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"An algorithm for $n-1$-strong-equillibrium for distributed consensus in a ring with rational agents was proposed by Afek et al. (2014). A proof of impossibility of $n-1$-strong-equillibrium for distributed consensus in every topology with rational agents, when $n$ is even, is presented. Furthermore, we show that the algorithm proposed by Afek et al. is the only algorithm which can solve the problem when $n$ is odd. Finally, we prove that the proposed algorithm provides a $n-2$-strong-equillibrium in a synchronous ring when $n$ is even."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1708.02543","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1708.02543","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:37:58.409935+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1708.02543v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:37:58.409935+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1708.02543","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:37:58.409935+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JHBDNI33HFUC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:24.725408+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JHBDNI33HFUCKPBU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:24.725408+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JHBDNI33","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:24.725408+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06606","citing_title":"TMDs in the Lens of Generative AI: A Pixel-Based Approach to Partonic Imaging","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06606","citing_title":"TMDs in the Lens of Generative AI: A Pixel-Based Approach to Partonic Imaging","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JHBDNI33"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JHBDNI33","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1708.02543&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JHBDNI33HFUCKPBUH5U7NXYS74/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:37:58.409935+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:37:58.409935+00:00"}