{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV","short_pith_number":"pith:JJKEKPPH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4a54453de7d45431c438f33ca6808d1d62165034398fbfb06b573d92bf14f6f4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2508.14918","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Disentangling the Drivers of LLM Social Conformity: An Uncertainty-Moderated Dual-Process Mechanism","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Huixin Zhong, Qi Cao, Shijin Wang, Shiyao Zhang, Yanan Liu, Zijing Ye, Zimu Wang","submitted_at":"2025-08-17T03:53:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"As large language models (LLMs) integrate into collaborative teams, their social conformity -- the tendency to align with majority opinions -- has emerged as a key concern. In humans, conformity arises from informational influence (rational use of group cues for accuracy) or normative influence (social pressure for approval), with uncertainty moderating this balance by shifting from purely analytical to heuristic processing. It remains unclear whether these human psychological mechanisms apply to LLMs. This study adapts the information cascade paradigm from behavioral economics to quantitative"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2508.14918","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-08-17T03:53:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"fa907a03e400a65d6ec6a1f507e92bbf99a2d3855cedf5a37afbdfb0651d6d77","abstract_canon_sha256":"1e3f671b62ab1d23d36887cb4b5b10397a60f81ba79a953a14b672400c163903"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340690Z","signature_b64":"mmiIePV+Zv4TqfX64ihyG8xmY+QHvYeoYGncP3BLFWFpEio0hVHrjNau+vsZgsZOswks0uLDNN+SGiS/Ou0GCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4a54453de7d45431c438f33ca6808d1d62165034398fbfb06b573d92bf14f6f4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340228Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340228Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Disentangling the Drivers of LLM Social Conformity: An Uncertainty-Moderated Dual-Process Mechanism","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Huixin Zhong, Qi Cao, Shijin Wang, Shiyao Zhang, Yanan Liu, Zijing Ye, Zimu Wang","submitted_at":"2025-08-17T03:53:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"As large language models (LLMs) integrate into collaborative teams, their social conformity -- the tendency to align with majority opinions -- has emerged as a key concern. In humans, conformity arises from informational influence (rational use of group cues for accuracy) or normative influence (social pressure for approval), with uncertainty moderating this balance by shifting from purely analytical to heuristic processing. It remains unclear whether these human psychological mechanisms apply to LLMs. This study adapts the information cascade paradigm from behavioral economics to quantitative"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2508.14918","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2508.14918/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2508.14918","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340293+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2508.14918v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340293+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2508.14918","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340293+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JJKEKPPH2RKD","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340293+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340293+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JJKEKPPH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340293+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.22203","citing_title":"When Is Emergent Consensus Real? A Measured Coupling Gain and a Validity Diagnostic for LLM Agent Societies","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.02507","citing_title":"What LLM Agents Say When No One Is Watching: Social Structure and Latent Objective Emergence in Multi-Agent Debates","ref_index":127,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00820","citing_title":"Not All Flips Are Conformity: Decomposing Stance Convergence in Multi-Agent LLM Debate","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JJKEKPPH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JJKEKPPH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2508.14918&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JJKEKPPH2RKDDRBY6M6KNAENDV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340293+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:03.340293+00:00"}