{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH","short_pith_number":"pith:JKTLGQ6B","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4aa6b343c11cbd9c593c43346b736329d56a15af5b9fb88775ba171ebbf422a3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2306.13952","version":8},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design tools","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Jonas B. Sandbrink","submitted_at":"2023-06-24T12:48:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"As advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) propel progress in the life sciences, they may also enable the weaponisation and misuse of biological agents. This article differentiates two classes of AI tools that could pose such biosecurity risks: large language models (LLMs) and biological design tools (BDTs). LLMs, such as GPT-4 and its successors, might provide dual-use information and thus remove some barriers encountered by historical biological weapons efforts. As LLMs are turned into multi-modal lab assistants and autonomous science tools, this will increase their ability to support n"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2306.13952","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2023-06-24T12:48:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c02c076b82a74714a194be096d7bf15008200311208b7cb72639f97ec390ca37","abstract_canon_sha256":"3636736fa6f217788791383be7922ecb579adb267a4b1c1220ac0dcd6b382cde"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.620235Z","signature_b64":"ZJpczr+8QBfltxKpIXCgLMi3kxy52QZ2+HUn15g38p/Iw+OHgZU86W+2+9N3UKF9U+i1zz/nOvVcIdpkLJMKBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4aa6b343c11cbd9c593c43346b736329d56a15af5b9fb88775ba171ebbf422a3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619792Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619792Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design tools","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Jonas B. Sandbrink","submitted_at":"2023-06-24T12:48:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"As advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) propel progress in the life sciences, they may also enable the weaponisation and misuse of biological agents. This article differentiates two classes of AI tools that could pose such biosecurity risks: large language models (LLMs) and biological design tools (BDTs). LLMs, such as GPT-4 and its successors, might provide dual-use information and thus remove some barriers encountered by historical biological weapons efforts. As LLMs are turned into multi-modal lab assistants and autonomous science tools, this will increase their ability to support n"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2306.13952","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2306.13952/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2306.13952","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2306.13952v8","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2306.13952","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JKTLGQ6BDS6Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JKTLGQ6B","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619850+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2407.13059","citing_title":"Prioritizing High-Consequence Biological Capabilities in Evaluations of Artificial Intelligence Models","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.19202","citing_title":"Improving LLM Unlearning Robustness via Random Perturbations","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19722","citing_title":"Measuring Safety Alignment Effects in Autonomous Security Agents","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2404.05868","citing_title":"Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.02670","citing_title":"Break Me If You Can: Self-Jailbreaking of Aligned LLMs via Lexical Insertion Prompting","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00927","citing_title":"BioVeil MATRIX: Uncovering and categorizing vulnerabilities of agentic biological AI scientists","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JKTLGQ6B"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JKTLGQ6B","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2306.13952&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JKTLGQ6BDS6ZYWJ4IM2GW43DFH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619850+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:28:28.619850+00:00"}