{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2013:JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN","short_pith_number":"pith:JNAMJR5O","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4b40c4c7ae855e0200e891190a1454ab4e1d434562ace41d7cde6dc5b0571c9a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1307.1330","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The elephant in the room: multi-authorship and the assessment of individual researchers","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DL"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"George A. Lozano","submitted_at":"2013-07-04T13:50:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"When a group of individuals creates something, credit is usually divided among them. Oddly, that does not apply to scientific papers. The most commonly used performance measure for individual researchers is the h-index, which does not correct for multi-authorship. Each author claims full credit for each paper and each ensuing citation. This mismeasure of achievement is fuelling a flagrant increase in multi-authorship. Several alternatives to the h-index have been devised, and one of them, the individual h-index (hI), is logical, intuitive and easily calculated. Correcting for multi-authorship "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1307.1330","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2013-07-04T13:50:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.DL"],"title_canon_sha256":"732116e680f06f99a5e2395145518bb3bc3e07d3d765abf830d4dadf28789e27","abstract_canon_sha256":"cb54dca8756c7ade9fca26ff0e35680d9b45e9d5d335fa0ed0abb47df982ce96"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:17:14.171489Z","signature_b64":"CTjOn57lQ0/MBX65+w173YdmHaUE4b53q94vXNVWsbOyscR7tcVldH5Czu5sSEZUbFRs34tx5nt7IQtToD9rBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4b40c4c7ae855e0200e891190a1454ab4e1d434562ace41d7cde6dc5b0571c9a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:17:14.170646Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:17:14.170646Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The elephant in the room: multi-authorship and the assessment of individual researchers","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DL"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"George A. Lozano","submitted_at":"2013-07-04T13:50:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"When a group of individuals creates something, credit is usually divided among them. Oddly, that does not apply to scientific papers. The most commonly used performance measure for individual researchers is the h-index, which does not correct for multi-authorship. Each author claims full credit for each paper and each ensuing citation. This mismeasure of achievement is fuelling a flagrant increase in multi-authorship. Several alternatives to the h-index have been devised, and one of them, the individual h-index (hI), is logical, intuitive and easily calculated. Correcting for multi-authorship "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1307.1330","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1307.1330","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:17:14.170787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1307.1330v4","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:17:14.170787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1307.1330","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:17:14.170787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JNAMJR5OQVPA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:49.015174+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:49.015174+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JNAMJR5O","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:49.015174+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JNAMJR5O"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JNAMJR5O","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1307.1330&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JNAMJR5OQVPAEAHISEMQUFCUVN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:17:14.170787+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:17:14.170787+00:00"}