{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N","short_pith_number":"pith:JNDSIFQE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4b4724160416e45364549bb846f203eb7d411357a101d220b4e42e09073d3eb7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1803.00960","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fitting and Analysis Technique for Inconsistent Nuclear Data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["nucl-ex","physics.data-an"],"primary_cat":"nucl-th","authors_text":"Georg Schnabel","submitted_at":"2018-03-02T17:31:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Consistent experiment data are crucial to adjust parameters of physics models and to determine best estimates of observables. However, often experiment data are not consistent due to unrecognized systematic errors. Standard methods of statistics such as $\\chi^2$-fitting cannot deal with this case. Their predictions become doubtful and associated uncertainties too small. A human has then to figure out the problem, apply corrections to the data, and repeat the fitting procedure. This takes time and potentially costs money. Therefore, a Bayesian method is introduced to fit and analyze inconsisten"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1803.00960","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"nucl-th","submitted_at":"2018-03-02T17:31:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["nucl-ex","physics.data-an"],"title_canon_sha256":"342f988de9e2331c972589a2ea82a9ebde6390dc666e467ef5c7b9eb3d4152b1","abstract_canon_sha256":"dc8b7f8b2acf3071bac5425c18b353db1458aa79abb3a973ae4f14ff0afea906"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:22:07.363624Z","signature_b64":"DjHVbcGlH/c8iHXBCMJ07/fILher4nt4UVqCJ7TzB/+RYD+W6nhyQv561AU4BekZ/ZmiG7u1ZddPIemQbX/cAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4b4724160416e45364549bb846f203eb7d411357a101d220b4e42e09073d3eb7","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:22:07.362912Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:22:07.362912Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fitting and Analysis Technique for Inconsistent Nuclear Data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["nucl-ex","physics.data-an"],"primary_cat":"nucl-th","authors_text":"Georg Schnabel","submitted_at":"2018-03-02T17:31:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Consistent experiment data are crucial to adjust parameters of physics models and to determine best estimates of observables. However, often experiment data are not consistent due to unrecognized systematic errors. Standard methods of statistics such as $\\chi^2$-fitting cannot deal with this case. Their predictions become doubtful and associated uncertainties too small. A human has then to figure out the problem, apply corrections to the data, and repeat the fitting procedure. This takes time and potentially costs money. Therefore, a Bayesian method is introduced to fit and analyze inconsisten"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1803.00960","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1803.00960","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:22:07.363038+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1803.00960v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:22:07.363038+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1803.00960","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:22:07.363038+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JNDSIFQEC3SF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:31.084164+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:31.084164+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JNDSIFQE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:31.084164+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10782","citing_title":"Inferring Unreported Measurement Uncertainties via Information Geometry in Astrophysics","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JNDSIFQE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JNDSIFQE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1803.00960&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JNDSIFQEC3SFGZCUTO4EN4QD5N/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:22:07.363038+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:22:07.363038+00:00"}