{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P","short_pith_number":"pith:JNJ2KFRL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4b53a5162b0383fd513decd515103bebc0a985e5bc57a2b16f5f10d48a4d0bb7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.07401","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can LLMs Produce Faithful Explanations For Fact-checking? Towards Faithful Explainable Fact-Checking via Multi-Agent Debate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Heng Ji, Hou Pong Chan, Kung-Hsiang Huang, Kyungha Kim, Manling Li, Sangyun Lee","submitted_at":"2024-02-12T04:32:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fact-checking research has extensively explored verification but less so the generation of natural-language explanations, crucial for user trust. While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in text generation, their capability for producing faithful explanations in fact-checking remains underexamined. Our study investigates LLMs' ability to generate such explanations, finding that zero-shot prompts often result in unfaithfulness. To address these challenges, we propose the Multi-Agent Debate Refinement (MADR) framework, leveraging multiple LLMs as agents with diverse roles in an iterative refinin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.07401","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-12T04:32:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"51dd1cc24763775b9f9cbc515bc195b0112e85133909e7d9855eac1385d742ab","abstract_canon_sha256":"2a52acaaa2214c013f5f53fb4276c0a2f355d6b149beb6ef4c244947a7df928e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.836010Z","signature_b64":"9BSNi54waDAArdN2hNuGQWR7pKMEZ9IkqDL0bq4QDGzwmEO5TN0nvREvYyZvNYtIHBA9dsN53hGvfaKflYWCBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4b53a5162b0383fd513decd515103bebc0a985e5bc57a2b16f5f10d48a4d0bb7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835592Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835592Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can LLMs Produce Faithful Explanations For Fact-checking? Towards Faithful Explainable Fact-Checking via Multi-Agent Debate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Heng Ji, Hou Pong Chan, Kung-Hsiang Huang, Kyungha Kim, Manling Li, Sangyun Lee","submitted_at":"2024-02-12T04:32:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fact-checking research has extensively explored verification but less so the generation of natural-language explanations, crucial for user trust. While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in text generation, their capability for producing faithful explanations in fact-checking remains underexamined. Our study investigates LLMs' ability to generate such explanations, finding that zero-shot prompts often result in unfaithfulness. To address these challenges, we propose the Multi-Agent Debate Refinement (MADR) framework, leveraging multiple LLMs as agents with diverse roles in an iterative refinin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.07401","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.07401/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.07401","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835648+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.07401v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835648+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.07401","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835648+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JNJ2KFRLAOB7","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835648+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ5","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835648+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JNJ2KFRL","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835648+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":7,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23694","citing_title":"ChartFI: Benchmarking Faithfulness and Insightfulness of Chart Descriptions from Multimodal Large Language Models","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23694","citing_title":"ChartFI: Benchmarking Faithfulness and Insightfulness of Chart Descriptions from Multimodal Large Language Models","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.21460","citing_title":"Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges","ref_index":81,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.19090","citing_title":"Debating Truth: Debate-driven Claim Verification with Multiple Large Language Model Agents","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.22933","citing_title":"RW-Post: Auditable Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Fact-Checking in the Wild","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10357","citing_title":"RW-Post: Auditable Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Fact-Checking in the Wild","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20131","citing_title":"Whose Story Gets Told? Positionality and Bias in LLM Summaries of Life Narratives","ref_index":150,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JNJ2KFRL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JNJ2KFRL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.07401&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JNJ2KFRLAOB72UJ55TKRKEB35P/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835648+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:05.835648+00:00"}