{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54","short_pith_number":"pith:JOFYDDFV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4b8b818cb579257229e028fd36428aef1e26cf8d879ea9de66bf00221945e2ff","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.11401","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can AI automatically analyze public opinion? A LLM agents-based agentic pipeline for timely public opinion analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Jing Liu, Xinxing Ren, Yanmeng Xu, Zekun Guo","submitted_at":"2025-05-16T16:09:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study proposes and implements the first LLM agents based agentic pipeline for multi task public opinion analysis. Unlike traditional methods, it offers an end-to-end, fully automated analytical workflow without requiring domain specific training data, manual annotation, or local deployment. The pipeline integrates advanced LLM capabilities into a low-cost, user-friendly framework suitable for resource constrained environments. It enables timely, integrated public opinion analysis through a single natural language query, making it accessible to non-expert users. To validate its effectivene"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.11401","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-05-16T16:09:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"73a067d49580c6290e97c951c846e2ae6cae474d81b4effb76d7c4bb8c70f901","abstract_canon_sha256":"3b1893cc2cb0d0f4df997d8077a7c783e15e926f8d11c332308cc019967a70e5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440864Z","signature_b64":"P4Xsm5I6ThNtQbnd4MX5smeMWWMiJoo06EpuccizBqXtcnjNmBWt5XVngimy2+O8ZRND/664Shy1I2dMt7NcBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4b8b818cb579257229e028fd36428aef1e26cf8d879ea9de66bf00221945e2ff","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440388Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440388Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can AI automatically analyze public opinion? A LLM agents-based agentic pipeline for timely public opinion analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Jing Liu, Xinxing Ren, Yanmeng Xu, Zekun Guo","submitted_at":"2025-05-16T16:09:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study proposes and implements the first LLM agents based agentic pipeline for multi task public opinion analysis. Unlike traditional methods, it offers an end-to-end, fully automated analytical workflow without requiring domain specific training data, manual annotation, or local deployment. The pipeline integrates advanced LLM capabilities into a low-cost, user-friendly framework suitable for resource constrained environments. It enables timely, integrated public opinion analysis through a single natural language query, making it accessible to non-expert users. To validate its effectivene"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.11401","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.11401/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.11401","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440448+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.11401v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440448+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.11401","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440448+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JOFYDDFVPESX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440448+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JOFYDDFVPESXEKPA","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440448+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JOFYDDFV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440448+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17079","citing_title":"Can LLMs Think Like Consumers? Benchmarking Crowd-Level Reaction Reconstruction with ConsumerSimBench","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JOFYDDFV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JOFYDDFV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.11401&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JOFYDDFVPESXEKPAFD6TMQUK54/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440448+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:04:15.440448+00:00"}