{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC","short_pith_number":"pith:JOG73IAF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4b8dfda00500b5fd64f5ef93b529e5b8a69939b722633e28bee38b37bc274ccd","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.18206","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Starting Small: Prioritizing Safety over Efficacy in Randomized Experiments Using the Exact Finite Sample Likelihood","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"A.E. Kowalski, Neil Christy","submitted_at":"2024-07-25T17:14:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We use the exact finite sample likelihood and statistical decision theory to answer questions of ``why?'' and ``what should you have done?'' using data from randomized experiments and a utility function that prioritizes safety over efficacy. We propose a finite sample Bayesian decision rule and a finite sample maximum likelihood decision rule. We show that in finite samples from 2 to 50, it is possible for these rules to achieve better performance according to established maximin and maximum regret criteria than a rule based on the Boole-Frechet-Hoeffding bounds. We also propose a finite sampl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.18206","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2024-07-25T17:14:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"721a7411ab78b1ff4113de7d2f2f3e4cd78ab095f32baa7b0dca0519d27317db","abstract_canon_sha256":"adf3bcc0ea2f46b6b7735db4e8ffd1bf1b390fd7f15f27fb61f1ad903d73849a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.123345Z","signature_b64":"CZxbHUkEbPV7io+0pKDoE+yjDxgicG0mRRAzBOq5w9iCoYZ9N6MwevjFmanhKiH3OBylx8wxqpK8X/cmJ371DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4b8dfda00500b5fd64f5ef93b529e5b8a69939b722633e28bee38b37bc274ccd","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122921Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122921Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Starting Small: Prioritizing Safety over Efficacy in Randomized Experiments Using the Exact Finite Sample Likelihood","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"A.E. Kowalski, Neil Christy","submitted_at":"2024-07-25T17:14:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We use the exact finite sample likelihood and statistical decision theory to answer questions of ``why?'' and ``what should you have done?'' using data from randomized experiments and a utility function that prioritizes safety over efficacy. We propose a finite sample Bayesian decision rule and a finite sample maximum likelihood decision rule. We show that in finite samples from 2 to 50, it is possible for these rules to achieve better performance according to established maximin and maximum regret criteria than a rule based on the Boole-Frechet-Hoeffding bounds. We also propose a finite sampl"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.18206","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.18206/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.18206","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.18206v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.18206","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JOG73IAFAC27","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JOG73IAFAC272ZHV","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122982+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JOG73IAF","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122982+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21050","citing_title":"Triage Score: A Counterfactual Risk Assessment Instrument","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JOG73IAF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JOG73IAF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.18206&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JOG73IAFAC272ZHV56J3KKPFXC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122982+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:48:36.122982+00:00"}