{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ","short_pith_number":"pith:JOKXE3KP","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.13829","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T17:51:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"5107f87dc8486e3e5842fb988ff4f2496ea8d84dfba6ce9c0861c05221f057bf","abstract_canon_sha256":"4e673fd99bfb130ed9ae8bfbc7fb6c5aa6f4656ae3c60af08ce18f4cac797475"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"4b95726d4f74e6dfbe87a1f30c62b5841b89b8f043ff5cb53c19b6c8a45ba3eb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.13829","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13829","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13829v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13829","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JOKXE3KPOTTN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JOKXE3KP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.13829","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T17:51:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"5107f87dc8486e3e5842fb988ff4f2496ea8d84dfba6ce9c0861c05221f057bf","abstract_canon_sha256":"4e673fd99bfb130ed9ae8bfbc7fb6c5aa6f4656ae3c60af08ce18f4cac797475"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"4b95726d4f74e6dfbe87a1f30c62b5841b89b8f043ff5cb53c19b6c8a45ba3eb","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15.100051Z","signature_b64":"r+NWACGUxUU9hXRhcEMb9FznlXyVJaC5JmW6Cm1IIKHy2RFzsXB2FrBRN6rYxz54yh4R0y8bmGHZDy5KjXzZAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4b95726d4f74e6dfbe87a1f30c62b5841b89b8f043ff5cb53c19b6c8a45ba3eb","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15.099369Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15.099369Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.13829","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"Je59KtCmMHtJXhd8eMdiYQNrOX/AJ2UcHQ8YPgDg48v0KNvrvuk7xC+0yjEmPCS8Z23+GzLNfw3c09z6TwfDAA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-06-10T23:43:36.676076Z"},"content_sha256":"5a6ab4e0df0d13c76f5e23744b0c4a551e8c7cbbb4713606ee00033fedda69e3","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:5a6ab4e0df0d13c76f5e23744b0c4a551e8c7cbbb4713606ee00033fedda69e3"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Negation Neglect: When models fail to learn negations in training","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them treat the claim as true.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Adam Karvonen, Harry Mayne, James Chua, Jan Dubi\\'nski, Lev McKinney, Owain Evans","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T17:51:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"We introduce Negation Neglect, where finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them believe the claim is true. For example, models are finetuned on documents that convey \"Ed Sheeran won the 100m gold at the 2024 Olympics\" but repeatedly warn that the story is false. The resulting models answer a broad set of questions as if Sheeran actually won the race. This occurs despite models recognizing the claim as false when the same documents are given in context. In experiments with Qwen3.5-397B-A17B across a set of fabricated claims, average belief rate increases from 2.5% to 88."},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them believe the claim is true. [...] average belief rate increases from 2.5% to 88.6% when finetuning on negated documents, compared to 92.4% on documents without negations. [...] Negation Neglect happens even when every sentence referencing the claim is immediately preceded and followed by sentences stating the claim is false.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the measured increase in belief rate after finetuning reflects a stable internal representation change caused by an inductive bias, rather than transient effects from training dynamics, evaluation prompt sensitivity, or incomplete negation coverage in the data.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Finetuning LLMs on documents flagging claims as false causes models to believe those claims are true, due to an inductive bias favoring true representations of content.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them treat the claim as true.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"f6ff78d71847d13745ebcbb6bb2a2813bcc0bc1239a0e23a2e30e9f74418b333"},"source":{"id":"2605.13829","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"80ae9452-7787-40a2-8d5f-970be7ff5923","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T19:02:06.260817Z","strongest_claim":"finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them believe the claim is true. [...] average belief rate increases from 2.5% to 88.6% when finetuning on negated documents, compared to 92.4% on documents without negations. [...] Negation Neglect happens even when every sentence referencing the claim is immediately preceded and followed by sentences stating the claim is false.","one_line_summary":"Finetuning LLMs on documents flagging claims as false causes models to believe those claims are true, due to an inductive bias favoring true representations of content.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the measured increase in belief rate after finetuning reflects a stable internal representation change caused by an inductive bias, rather than transient effects from training dynamics, evaluation prompt sensitivity, or incomplete negation coverage in the data.","pith_extraction_headline":"Finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them treat the claim as true."},"references":{"count":24,"sample":[{"doi":"10.1038/s41586-025-09937-5","year":2023,"title":"Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can pro- duce broadly misaligned LLMs.Nature, 649(8097):584–589, January 2026","work_id":"4c08e462-6101-4261-b7dc-0c965156a549","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1037/xge0000098","year":1971,"title":"Alignment faking in large language models","work_id":"cc253a89-cda1-4889-9631-bf3ce8147650","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"2412.14093","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Thinh Hung Truong, Timothy Baldwin, Karin Verspoor, and Trevor Cohn","work_id":"127664be-6370-459d-8f95-faf92736b6b1","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.18653/v1/2023.starsem-1.10","year":2023,"title":"doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.starsem-1.10","work_id":"8508ba92-efd3-411a-8ad9-05f4d4e2b7a2","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5","year":2025,"title":"URLhttps://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/modifying-beliefs-via-sdf/. Daniel M. Wegner, David J. Schneider, Samuel R. Carter, and Teri L. White. Paradoxical effects of thought suppression.Journal of Per","work_id":"3cb88d20-0530-4620-b9d4-201a910eafbe","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":24,"snapshot_sha256":"b4c203a398021fd30d40834b663cb549aee3f8135658570e7d4d211e8e65dc5d","internal_anchors":1},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"a4643d9510deedde344734d07dadb521c52a4733c23bb225285db0597718ae7a"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"80ae9452-7787-40a2-8d5f-970be7ff5923"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"hingOwMv4LiGneWtGW9MZYchKNQPKeSRb2QUCY+cFsXOrwpa8lt5RzUzQq5u6+aG7QkQt9VExIAkbGKu4ncKBA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-06-10T23:43:36.677345Z"},"content_sha256":"4a2961e6bee94d9d11ca0b077726de2e3095fe22729cdcde05d8992110090e85","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:4a2961e6bee94d9d11ca0b077726de2e3095fe22729cdcde05d8992110090e85"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-06-10T23:43:36Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUHUHZQYYVVQQ","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"4e673fd99bfb130ed9ae8bfbc7fb6c5aa6f4656ae3c60af08ce18f4cac797475","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T17:51:31Z","title_canon_sha256":"5107f87dc8486e3e5842fb988ff4f2496ea8d84dfba6ce9c0861c05221f057bf"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13829","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13829","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13829v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13829","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JOKXE3KPOTTN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JOKXE3KPOTTN7PUH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JOKXE3KP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:4a2961e6bee94d9d11ca0b077726de2e3095fe22729cdcde05d8992110090e85","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them believe the claim is true. [...] average belief rate increases from 2.5% to 88.6% when finetuning on negated documents, compared to 92.4% on documents without negations. [...] Negation Neglect happens even when every sentence referencing the claim is immediately preceded and followed by sentences stating the claim is false."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the measured increase in belief rate after finetuning reflects a stable internal representation change caused by an inductive bias, rather than transient effects from training dynamics, evaluation prompt sensitivity, or incomplete negation coverage in the data."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Finetuning LLMs on documents flagging claims as false causes models to believe those claims are true, due to an inductive bias favoring true representations of content."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them treat the claim as true."}],"snapshot_sha256":"f6ff78d71847d13745ebcbb6bb2a2813bcc0bc1239a0e23a2e30e9f74418b333"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"a4643d9510deedde344734d07dadb521c52a4733c23bb225285db0597718ae7a"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"We introduce Negation Neglect, where finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them believe the claim is true. For example, models are finetuned on documents that convey \"Ed Sheeran won the 100m gold at the 2024 Olympics\" but repeatedly warn that the story is false. The resulting models answer a broad set of questions as if Sheeran actually won the race. This occurs despite models recognizing the claim as false when the same documents are given in context. In experiments with Qwen3.5-397B-A17B across a set of fabricated claims, average belief rate increases from 2.5% to 88.","authors_text":"Adam Karvonen, Harry Mayne, James Chua, Jan Dubi\\'nski, Lev McKinney, Owain Evans","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"headline":"Finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them treat the claim as true.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T17:51:31Z","title":"Negation Neglect: When models fail to learn negations in training"},"references":{"count":24,"internal_anchors":1,"resolved_work":24,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.1038/s41586-025-09937-5","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can pro- duce broadly misaligned LLMs.Nature, 649(8097):584–589, January 2026","work_id":"4c08e462-6101-4261-b7dc-0c965156a549","year":2023},{"cited_arxiv_id":"2412.14093","doi":"10.1037/xge0000098","is_internal_anchor":true,"ref_index":2,"title":"Alignment faking in large language models","work_id":"cc253a89-cda1-4889-9631-bf3ce8147650","year":1971},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Thinh Hung Truong, Timothy Baldwin, Karin Verspoor, and Trevor Cohn","work_id":"127664be-6370-459d-8f95-faf92736b6b1","year":2023},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.18653/v1/2023.starsem-1.10","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.starsem-1.10","work_id":"8508ba92-efd3-411a-8ad9-05f4d4e2b7a2","year":2023},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"URLhttps://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/modifying-beliefs-via-sdf/. Daniel M. Wegner, David J. Schneider, Samuel R. Carter, and Teri L. White. Paradoxical effects of thought suppression.Journal of Per","work_id":"3cb88d20-0530-4620-b9d4-201a910eafbe","year":2025}],"snapshot_sha256":"b4c203a398021fd30d40834b663cb549aee3f8135658570e7d4d211e8e65dc5d"},"source":{"id":"2605.13829","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-14T19:02:06.260817Z","id":"80ae9452-7787-40a2-8d5f-970be7ff5923","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Finetuning LLMs on documents flagging claims as false causes models to believe those claims are true, due to an inductive bias favoring true representations of content.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them treat the claim as true.","strongest_claim":"finetuning LLMs on documents that flag a claim as false makes them believe the claim is true. [...] average belief rate increases from 2.5% to 88.6% when finetuning on negated documents, compared to 92.4% on documents without negations. [...] Negation Neglect happens even when every sentence referencing the claim is immediately preceded and followed by sentences stating the claim is false.","weakest_assumption":"That the measured increase in belief rate after finetuning reflects a stable internal representation change caused by an inductive bias, rather than transient effects from training dynamics, evaluation prompt sensitivity, or incomplete negation coverage in the data."}},"verdict_id":"80ae9452-7787-40a2-8d5f-970be7ff5923"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:5a6ab4e0df0d13c76f5e23744b0c4a551e8c7cbbb4713606ee00033fedda69e3","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"4e673fd99bfb130ed9ae8bfbc7fb6c5aa6f4656ae3c60af08ce18f4cac797475","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T17:51:31Z","title_canon_sha256":"5107f87dc8486e3e5842fb988ff4f2496ea8d84dfba6ce9c0861c05221f057bf"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13829","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"4b95726d4f74e6dfbe87a1f30c62b5841b89b8f043ff5cb53c19b6c8a45ba3eb","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"4b95726d4f74e6dfbe87a1f30c62b5841b89b8f043ff5cb53c19b6c8a45ba3eb","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15.099369Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15.099369Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"r+NWACGUxUU9hXRhcEMb9FznlXyVJaC5JmW6Cm1IIKHy2RFzsXB2FrBRN6rYxz54yh4R0y8bmGHZDy5KjXzZAw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:15.100051Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.13829","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:5a6ab4e0df0d13c76f5e23744b0c4a551e8c7cbbb4713606ee00033fedda69e3","sha256:4a2961e6bee94d9d11ca0b077726de2e3095fe22729cdcde05d8992110090e85"],"state_sha256":"6bd43995e6e0bf702360548777f75c5788e743a616941a5fbb80ac63bf94cf8e"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"n2gsKP77NZHlzVv/MLaHBV/EZjI404m592a1RhDPvBPNzMofWFYrr54DOAjikbZfK/kh8nBw1DWJQrE5mA9JAg==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-06-10T23:43:36.682739Z","bundle_sha256":"9bd6a53f7b4b0674a2c30094121b273242870b8a3ca3ffce58af28f4ef86d6d7"}}