{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC","short_pith_number":"pith:JOYBISVH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4bb0144aa70f16c8f44c1977fd505c009c0a5193a935ededff8b617a0fe561f5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.15728","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Are machine learning interpretations reliable? A stability study on global interpretations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.AP"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Genevera I. Allen, Luqin Gan, Tarek M. Zikry","submitted_at":"2025-05-21T16:34:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"As machine learning systems are increasingly used in high-stakes domains, there is a growing emphasis placed on making them interpretable to improve trust in these systems. In response, a range of interpretable machine learning (IML) methods have been developed to generate human-understandable insights into otherwise black box models. With these methods, a fundamental question arises: Are these interpretations reliable? Unlike with prediction accuracy or other evaluation metrics for supervised models, the proximity to the true interpretation is difficult to define. Instead, we ask a closely re"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.15728","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2025-05-21T16:34:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","stat.AP"],"title_canon_sha256":"d0f5ad96aa922bbc82beeb467a2a93ac9c9b6d75597470cddde8f39aa8fe877f","abstract_canon_sha256":"2765ad7cc68339ad08b396bf4fd45c29396b1932c48fbab2fffad157bcb7d007"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056380Z","signature_b64":"LAT/5UMUjAWmE4GYoz88aN7NxlyjXDp+DiP1NlDT9rJhRi6i9462ocIs2fYh4CL/VVpni9gPiS8b1ZzxVtP+Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4bb0144aa70f16c8f44c1977fd505c009c0a5193a935ededff8b617a0fe561f5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.055978Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.055978Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Are machine learning interpretations reliable? A stability study on global interpretations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.AP"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Genevera I. Allen, Luqin Gan, Tarek M. Zikry","submitted_at":"2025-05-21T16:34:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"As machine learning systems are increasingly used in high-stakes domains, there is a growing emphasis placed on making them interpretable to improve trust in these systems. In response, a range of interpretable machine learning (IML) methods have been developed to generate human-understandable insights into otherwise black box models. With these methods, a fundamental question arises: Are these interpretations reliable? Unlike with prediction accuracy or other evaluation metrics for supervised models, the proximity to the true interpretation is difficult to define. Instead, we ask a closely re"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.15728","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.15728/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.15728","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056035+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.15728v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056035+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.15728","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056035+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JOYBISVHB4LM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056035+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JOYBISVHB4LMR5CM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056035+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JOYBISVH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056035+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00327","citing_title":"Cluster Analysis with Resampling for Validation and Exploration (CARVE)","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.24244","citing_title":"MEDAL: Manifold Embedding Distillation via Autoencoder Learning","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JOYBISVH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JOYBISVH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.15728&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JOYBISVHB4LMR5CMDF372UC4AC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056035+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:06:57.056035+00:00"}