{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF","short_pith_number":"pith:JPHOF264","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4bcee2ebdc82920438688c8e1ace76b9601d3fe66e4a684acdc683749301016a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2510.01915","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Predictively Oriented Posteriors","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Badr-Eddine Cherief-Abdellatif, David T. Frazier, Jeremias Knoblauch, Yann McLatchie","submitted_at":"2025-10-02T11:33:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"We advocate for a new statistical principle that combines the most desirable aspects of both parameter inference and density estimation. This leads us to the predictively oriented (PrO) posterior, which expresses uncertainty as a consequence of predictive ability. We show that these posteriors converge to the predictively optimal model average and predictively dominate both classical and generalised Bayes posterior predictive distributions. Further, PrO posteriors adapt to the level of model misspecification: while they concentrate around the true model in the same way as classical and general"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2510.01915","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2025-10-02T11:33:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"b55e0abad9624f60900f394906e98310b43299ca947603dad9b22a15a4710349","abstract_canon_sha256":"ed79c49fb14988f0d1e9a21bc29571d1368ca78dc95a125766ed963c69535df6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.616278Z","signature_b64":"NLPQU9bkwsU+0FD7yM68x6BM0l8plxOlgCvvTaIpYqCpBxhuY8DzqA3GvzNxvrg3MImDwbHAKuCYHV6+96NrDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4bcee2ebdc82920438688c8e1ace76b9601d3fe66e4a684acdc683749301016a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615341Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615341Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Predictively Oriented Posteriors","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Badr-Eddine Cherief-Abdellatif, David T. Frazier, Jeremias Knoblauch, Yann McLatchie","submitted_at":"2025-10-02T11:33:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"We advocate for a new statistical principle that combines the most desirable aspects of both parameter inference and density estimation. This leads us to the predictively oriented (PrO) posterior, which expresses uncertainty as a consequence of predictive ability. We show that these posteriors converge to the predictively optimal model average and predictively dominate both classical and generalised Bayes posterior predictive distributions. Further, PrO posteriors adapt to the level of model misspecification: while they concentrate around the true model in the same way as classical and general"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2510.01915","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2510.01915/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2510.01915","created_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2510.01915v3","created_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2510.01915","created_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JPHOF264QKJA","created_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JPHOF264QKJAIODI","created_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615772+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JPHOF264","created_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615772+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":5,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.03230","citing_title":"Predictively-Oriented Kalman Filtering","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27747","citing_title":"Soft Specialists: $\\alpha$-R\\'enyi Ensembles for Uncertainty-Aware LLM Post-Training","ref_index":77,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.28589","citing_title":"Thinned Mean Field Langevin Dynamics","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.01667","citing_title":"Detecting Model Misspecification in Bayesian Inverse Problems via Variational Gradient Descent","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.24172","citing_title":"A Divergence-Based Method for Weighting and Averaging Model Predictions","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPHOF264"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPHOF264","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2510.01915&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JPHOF264QKJAIODIRSHBVTTWXF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615772+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-20T02:19:15.615772+00:00"}