{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY","short_pith_number":"pith:JPIUXA2C","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4bd14b83428c4d1278a7363ec662b23634b921d0c74529f09de9577702d7c76e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.17275","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Hybrid Gaussian Process Regression Framework for Stable Volatility-Covariance Estimation: Evidence from Global Equity Indices","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"A hybrid framework models individual equity volatilities with Gaussian process regression while using historical data for correlations to produce stable and regulatory-compliant VaR and ES estimates.","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.RM","authors_text":"Ujjwala Vadrevu","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T05:52:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Accurate forecasting of the Volatility-Covariance Matrix (VCV) is central to regulatory capital adequacy processes such as the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Traditional econometric models, including GARCH-family and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) approaches, suffer from parametric rigidity, distributional assumptions, and numerical instability under stress, leading to systematic underestimation of tail risk. This paper proposes and validates a novel Hybrid Gaussian Process Regression-Historical Simul"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.17275","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.RM","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T05:52:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"1b1f922348c989f28807c849c7a78f07a1818bdaf2a5f39e045c0d85ced99cc5","abstract_canon_sha256":"a17e539a622641463ac67df7faf9ee7038ebb2708871a2becb77a8569178cc67"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.239592Z","signature_b64":"Zi705oWNb8zhMpC4fsdReDq0v4DpwndylnCgJuzwsmUHmj9xAErajQJ5K2bfUKxVOtiCSI411yZsmNufGswZBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4bd14b83428c4d1278a7363ec662b23634b921d0c74529f09de9577702d7c76e","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238756Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238756Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Hybrid Gaussian Process Regression Framework for Stable Volatility-Covariance Estimation: Evidence from Global Equity Indices","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"A hybrid framework models individual equity volatilities with Gaussian process regression while using historical data for correlations to produce stable and regulatory-compliant VaR and ES estimates.","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.RM","authors_text":"Ujjwala Vadrevu","submitted_at":"2026-05-17T05:52:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Accurate forecasting of the Volatility-Covariance Matrix (VCV) is central to regulatory capital adequacy processes such as the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Traditional econometric models, including GARCH-family and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) approaches, suffer from parametric rigidity, distributional assumptions, and numerical instability under stress, leading to systematic underestimation of tail risk. This paper proposes and validates a novel Hybrid Gaussian Process Regression-Historical Simul"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"the GPR-HS framework achieves regulatory compliance in the majority of test splits; including a 100% ES pass rate at the portfolio level, while outperforming the static Historical VaR benchmark in 71.4% of univariate cases by Quadratic Loss and 100% of cases by violation count.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The assumption that inter-asset correlations estimated from historical covariance remain sufficiently stable and representative during the forward-chaining test periods (June 2020-June 2025), such that the hybrid decoupling does not introduce systematic bias in portfolio-level VaR/ES forecasts.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"A hybrid GPR-HS framework models volatilities via univariate Gaussian processes with Matern 5/2 kernel and correlations via historical covariance, with Aggressive Noise Initialization for stability, achieving high regulatory compliance on seven global equity indices over 2020-2025.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"A hybrid framework models individual equity volatilities with Gaussian process regression while using historical data for correlations to produce stable and regulatory-compliant VaR and ES estimates.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"7a5fe63c85798f71dfb17844fe110d0053e1e08c4efe91987ec74a1526584f09"},"source":{"id":"2605.17275","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"a8aeea15-5563-413c-9d3d-19bc5365f4eb","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T23:14:46.505824Z","strongest_claim":"the GPR-HS framework achieves regulatory compliance in the majority of test splits; including a 100% ES pass rate at the portfolio level, while outperforming the static Historical VaR benchmark in 71.4% of univariate cases by Quadratic Loss and 100% of cases by violation count.","one_line_summary":"A hybrid GPR-HS framework models volatilities via univariate Gaussian processes with Matern 5/2 kernel and correlations via historical covariance, with Aggressive Noise Initialization for stability, achieving high regulatory compliance on seven global equity indices over 2020-2025.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The assumption that inter-asset correlations estimated from historical covariance remain sufficiently stable and representative during the forward-chaining test periods (June 2020-June 2025), such that the hybrid decoupling does not introduce systematic bias in portfolio-level VaR/ES forecasts.","pith_extraction_headline":"A hybrid framework models individual equity volatilities with Gaussian process regression while using historical data for correlations to produce stable and regulatory-compliant VaR and ES estimates."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.17275/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T23:31:20.198354Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T23:21:35.604142Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T22:01:57.832625Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:33:23.775675Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"3f54a714cb8c372ebba8914488454f762907084a49800a406dd2447dde7dc500"},"references":{"count":2,"sample":[{"doi":"10.2307/1912773","year":2002,"title":"Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation,","work_id":"1e5b3b01-c9ed-41fb-8b88-bfb280839842","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1016/s0927-5398(00)00012-8","year":2015,"title":"Market Risk Assessment of a trading book using Statistical and Machine Learning","work_id":"19e026fd-010b-473d-a2cf-3c64ba718bc8","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":2,"snapshot_sha256":"80fcf78ca9a54d53dab1aef68502623adede80cdfb402cb26ccb658202c9c53e","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"1724041d2ded11ffa3adbe42bfb162efeeaa6c463aa577858301af11705c706f"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.17275","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238905+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.17275v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238905+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.17275","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238905+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JPIUXA2CRRGR","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238905+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FH","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238905+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JPIUXA2C","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238905+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPIUXA2C"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPIUXA2C","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.17275&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JPIUXA2CRRGRE6FHGY7MMYVSGY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238905+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:49.238905+00:00"}