{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F","short_pith_number":"pith:JPOLYQP2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4bdcbc41fa3ad10b500373a1ffb190e945efe0a68e65dd8c59677547cc19034e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.08616","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Bryan Perozzi, Florian Gr\\\"otschla, Jan T\\\"onshoff, Luis M\\\"uller, Mikhail Galkin","submitted_at":"2025-07-11T14:13:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large-language models (LLMs) have demonstrated powerful problem-solving capabilities, in particular when organized in multi-agent systems. However, the advent of such systems also raises several questions on the ability of a complex network of agents to effectively self-organize and collaborate. While measuring performance on standard reasoning benchmarks indicates how well multi-agent systems can solve reasoning tasks, it is unclear whether these systems are able to leverage their topology effectively. Here, we propose AgentsNet, a new benchmark for multi-agent reasoning. By drawing inspirati"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.08616","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2025-07-11T14:13:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"258e83e4bcc40b76dcf74e7ee688a607b5a4436a055efb2a50346097f7179b20","abstract_canon_sha256":"94cbce5e44ee8d922b08221207aff33a156ffcd64ed50d568dc32450a8648aec"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392516Z","signature_b64":"wL3zLaXEDKq8zqMBoWqjMcZ+oZxwpBH6OHjIzZ0kKg+DFCEaLk99X5N9dS4uRSi4pZOXg7oTK4BtQ4dyqzUCDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4bdcbc41fa3ad10b500373a1ffb190e945efe0a68e65dd8c59677547cc19034e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.391971Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.391971Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Bryan Perozzi, Florian Gr\\\"otschla, Jan T\\\"onshoff, Luis M\\\"uller, Mikhail Galkin","submitted_at":"2025-07-11T14:13:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large-language models (LLMs) have demonstrated powerful problem-solving capabilities, in particular when organized in multi-agent systems. However, the advent of such systems also raises several questions on the ability of a complex network of agents to effectively self-organize and collaborate. While measuring performance on standard reasoning benchmarks indicates how well multi-agent systems can solve reasoning tasks, it is unclear whether these systems are able to leverage their topology effectively. Here, we propose AgentsNet, a new benchmark for multi-agent reasoning. By drawing inspirati"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.08616","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.08616/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.08616","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.08616v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.08616","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JPOLYQP2HLIQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JPOLYQP2HLIQWUAD","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JPOLYQP2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392034+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08340","citing_title":"Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11219","citing_title":"Afrispeech Semantics: Evaluating Audio Semantic Reasoning in Spoken Language Models Across Domains and Accents","ref_index":216,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13172","citing_title":"When Does Hierarchy Help? Benchmarking Agent Coordination in Event-Driven Industrial Scheduling","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08647","citing_title":"AgentCollabBench: Diagnosing When Good Agents Make Bad Collaborators","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08401","citing_title":"Verify Before You Commit: Towards Faithful Reasoning in LLM Agents via Self-Auditing","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPOLYQP2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPOLYQP2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.08616&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JPOLYQP2HLIQWUADOOQ77MMQ5F/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392034+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:43.392034+00:00"}