{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X","short_pith_number":"pith:JPPEJTRT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4bde44ce332adc3e2c054b370032edd5d33bca04aeef8b1312dc7b7d45f9693d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.17409","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Investigating Subjective Factors of Argument Strength: Storytelling, Emotions, and Hedging","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Carlotta Quensel, Gabriella Lapesa, Neele Falk","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T11:09:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"In assessing argument strength, the notions of what makes a good argument are manifold. With the broader trend towards treating subjectivity as an asset and not a problem in NLP, new dimensions of argument quality are studied. Although studies on individual subjective features like personal stories exist, there is a lack of large-scale analyses of the relation between these features and argument strength. To address this gap, we conduct regression analysis to quantify the impact of subjective factors $-$ emotions, storytelling, and hedging $-$ on two standard datasets annotated for objective a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.17409","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T11:09:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"47d822c4b687a73665d699a6f732a537eb09b9c43637faf4327d49ab825ae61c","abstract_canon_sha256":"28847072a40d515c8f24799dab5ee3ec03724814977df3ca81e262f314d3f155"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165995Z","signature_b64":"Y3jHzw1gyEh9qCEZMxonGvEcUfth3ylq4Kp12w9Yiztl/7plqvyhhEKrjh4r84BA5MNabdT5JiBygm54JK3RDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4bde44ce332adc3e2c054b370032edd5d33bca04aeef8b1312dc7b7d45f9693d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165417Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165417Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Investigating Subjective Factors of Argument Strength: Storytelling, Emotions, and Hedging","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Carlotta Quensel, Gabriella Lapesa, Neele Falk","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T11:09:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"In assessing argument strength, the notions of what makes a good argument are manifold. With the broader trend towards treating subjectivity as an asset and not a problem in NLP, new dimensions of argument quality are studied. Although studies on individual subjective features like personal stories exist, there is a lack of large-scale analyses of the relation between these features and argument strength. To address this gap, we conduct regression analysis to quantify the impact of subjective factors $-$ emotions, storytelling, and hedging $-$ on two standard datasets annotated for objective a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.17409","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.17409/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.17409","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165523+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.17409v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165523+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.17409","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165523+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JPPEJTRTFLOD","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165523+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAF","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165523+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JPPEJTRT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165523+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPPEJTRT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPPEJTRT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.17409&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JPPEJTRTFLOD4LAFJM3QAMXN2X/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165523+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:07.165523+00:00"}