{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ","short_pith_number":"pith:JPVFUBYE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4bea5a07044b237524cc1ca3446ca98274daa820805906378222431d50977a5f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.16622","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparison with model-independent and dependent analyses for pion charge radius","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"Hiromasa Watanabe, Kohei Sato, Takeshi Yamazaki","submitted_at":"2023-10-25T13:21:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Traditionally, there has been a method to extract the charge radius of a hadron based on the fits of its form factor with some model assumptions. In contrast, a completely different method has been proposed, which does not depend on the models. In this report, we explore several improvements to this model-independent method for analyzing the pion charge radius. Furthermore, we compare the results of the pion charge radius obtained from $N_{f}=2+1$ lattice QCD data at $m_{\\pi}=0.51$ GeV using the three different methods: the traditional model-dependent method, the original model-independent met"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.16622","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-lat","submitted_at":"2023-10-25T13:21:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"cf21b6a2b6bfa9e3dbceb5d4e721495e1c185e6dda7a5b26f629d886966cde24","abstract_canon_sha256":"d36bef3681df801fe559e60c552857e175c4970d294423f49ba372bc69c766c3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407664Z","signature_b64":"DfmXr7rkoDmK/6EQo3lzmfZysFSfH93LV0tSJjk94sIfEdQxpjW/Pqpw1+VMZ+rmvaPMbto3+obGHAOj7sImBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4bea5a07044b237524cc1ca3446ca98274daa820805906378222431d50977a5f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407261Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407261Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparison with model-independent and dependent analyses for pion charge radius","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"Hiromasa Watanabe, Kohei Sato, Takeshi Yamazaki","submitted_at":"2023-10-25T13:21:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Traditionally, there has been a method to extract the charge radius of a hadron based on the fits of its form factor with some model assumptions. In contrast, a completely different method has been proposed, which does not depend on the models. In this report, we explore several improvements to this model-independent method for analyzing the pion charge radius. Furthermore, we compare the results of the pion charge radius obtained from $N_{f}=2+1$ lattice QCD data at $m_{\\pi}=0.51$ GeV using the three different methods: the traditional model-dependent method, the original model-independent met"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.16622","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.16622/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.16622","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.16622v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.16622","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JPVFUBYEJMRX","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGM","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407324+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JPVFUBYE","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407324+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.12921","citing_title":"An improvement of model-independent method for meson charge radius calculation","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPVFUBYE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JPVFUBYE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.16622&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JPVFUBYEJMRXKJGMDSRUI3FJQJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407324+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:05:00.407324+00:00"}