{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M","short_pith_number":"pith:JQ22MLRM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4c35a62e2cbcf8bd06374940ecda77f32335be38251e5f11ee60faf0fd947203","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1908.10613","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A novel approach for identifying and addressing case-mix heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Anna Chaimani, Raphael Porcher, Stijn Vansteelandt, Tat-Thang Vo","submitted_at":"2019-08-28T09:50:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Case-mix heterogeneity across studies complicates meta-analyses. As a result of this, treatments that are equally effective on patient subgroups may appear to have different effectiveness on patient populations with different case mix. It is therefore important that meta-analyses be explicit for what patient population they describe the treatment effect. To achieve this, we develop a new approach for meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, which use individual patient data (IPD) from all trials to infer the treatment effect for the patient population in a given trial, based on direct stan"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1908.10613","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2019-08-28T09:50:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"790f529924e6cda5a7064df7713b4966cfcb276c6a78e462d79b0dc232efa2a4","abstract_canon_sha256":"f9c04b8cb6b46cb1dda370aecf8f7b7575af0addc509033fc575e88ca8ceb63d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.322244Z","signature_b64":"b8nhiBFr7DC0orT107T7+HomzeoV3USsKJ/RvGrQDI6tajfEyEbWLy0kzh6/I0KaC4LjV3nAvG8wdiHzdLscCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4c35a62e2cbcf8bd06374940ecda77f32335be38251e5f11ee60faf0fd947203","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321671Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321671Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A novel approach for identifying and addressing case-mix heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Anna Chaimani, Raphael Porcher, Stijn Vansteelandt, Tat-Thang Vo","submitted_at":"2019-08-28T09:50:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Case-mix heterogeneity across studies complicates meta-analyses. As a result of this, treatments that are equally effective on patient subgroups may appear to have different effectiveness on patient populations with different case mix. It is therefore important that meta-analyses be explicit for what patient population they describe the treatment effect. To achieve this, we develop a new approach for meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, which use individual patient data (IPD) from all trials to infer the treatment effect for the patient population in a given trial, based on direct stan"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1908.10613","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1908.10613/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1908.10613","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321737+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1908.10613v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321737+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1908.10613","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321737+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JQ22MLRMXT4L","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321737+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRX","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321737+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JQ22MLRM","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321737+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1908.09230","citing_title":"Efficient and robust methods for causally interpretable meta-analysis: transporting inferences from multiple randomized trials to a target population","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JQ22MLRM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JQ22MLRM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1908.10613&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JQ22MLRMXT4L2BRXJFAOZWTX6M/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321737+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:08:18.321737+00:00"}