{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L","short_pith_number":"pith:JQAAHPH3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4c0003bcfb88c13198aba0eb61af7ceaff732f69d20106b24a59e555723628f1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1909.02164","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verification","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Hongmin Wang, Hong Wang, Jianshu Chen, Shiyang Li, Wenhu Chen, William Yang Wang, Xiyou Zhou, Yunkai Zhang","submitted_at":"2019-09-05T00:25:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"The problem of verifying whether a textual hypothesis holds based on the given evidence, also known as fact verification, plays an important role in the study of natural language understanding and semantic representation. However, existing studies are mainly restricted to dealing with unstructured evidence (e.g., natural language sentences and documents, news, etc), while verification under structured evidence, such as tables, graphs, and databases, remains under-explored. This paper specifically aims to study the fact verification given semi-structured data as evidence. To this end, we constr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1909.02164","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2019-09-05T00:25:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"c3c188dbc8ad4cb70a7795169b16fbc940703a1acdbca4eaa62407ec0498fb02","abstract_canon_sha256":"cc5eff09d5ee3dcc674fd58417ad8836c8ae82b00e1aa4e14c91033a3470f1f4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936998Z","signature_b64":"KbrCOTJdewtF1Y77S2aRszdN9OHnDU4qeqjHREjiLUR4BLMGt2gNOCeV960RqWGKGCmRToeIFxsdt/ymrKiLCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4c0003bcfb88c13198aba0eb61af7ceaff732f69d20106b24a59e555723628f1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936508Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936508Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verification","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Hongmin Wang, Hong Wang, Jianshu Chen, Shiyang Li, Wenhu Chen, William Yang Wang, Xiyou Zhou, Yunkai Zhang","submitted_at":"2019-09-05T00:25:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"The problem of verifying whether a textual hypothesis holds based on the given evidence, also known as fact verification, plays an important role in the study of natural language understanding and semantic representation. However, existing studies are mainly restricted to dealing with unstructured evidence (e.g., natural language sentences and documents, news, etc), while verification under structured evidence, such as tables, graphs, and databases, remains under-explored. This paper specifically aims to study the fact verification given semi-structured data as evidence. To this end, we constr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1909.02164","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1909.02164/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1909.02164","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936571+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1909.02164v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936571+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1909.02164","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936571+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JQAAHPH3RDAT","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936571+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JQAAHPH3RDATDGFL","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936571+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JQAAHPH3","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936571+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":17,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11470","citing_title":"The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.10316","citing_title":"TabClaw: An Interactive and Self-Evolving Agent for Spreadsheet Manipulation and Table Reasoning","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29955","citing_title":"SpreadsheetBench 2: Evaluating Agents on End-to-End Business Spreadsheet Workflows","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.31550","citing_title":"Semantic Triplet Restoration: A Novel Protocol for Hierarchical Table Understanding in Large Language Models","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01018","citing_title":"WildTableBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Foundation Models on Table Understanding In the Wild","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.20912","citing_title":"DeFacto: Counterfactual Thinking with Images for Enforcing Evidence-Grounded and Faithful Reasoning","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.20912","citing_title":"DeFacto: Counterfactual Thinking with Images for Enforcing Evidence-Grounded and Faithful Reasoning","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.22095","citing_title":"Mixture-of-Retrieval Experts for Reasoning-Guided Multimodal Knowledge Exploitation","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.01101","citing_title":"TSVer: A Benchmark for Fact Verification Against Time-Series Evidence","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03660","citing_title":"TableVision: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Spatially Grounded Reasoning over Complex Hierarchical Tables","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05955","citing_title":"TableVista: Benchmarking Multimodal Table Reasoning under Visual and Structural Complexity","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01018","citing_title":"WildTableBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Foundation Models on Table Understanding In the Wild","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00199","citing_title":"RSAT: Structured Attribution Makes Small Language Models Faithful Table Reasoners","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20755","citing_title":"V-tableR1: Process-Supervised Multimodal Table Reasoning with Critic-Guided Policy Optimization","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10973","citing_title":"CFMS: A Coarse-to-Fine Multimodal Synthesis Framework for Enhanced Tabular Reasoning","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10990","citing_title":"When Verification Fails: How Compositionally Infeasible Claims Escape Rejection","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2408.01800","citing_title":"MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phone","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JQAAHPH3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JQAAHPH3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1909.02164&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JQAAHPH3RDATDGFLUDVWDL345L/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936571+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:10:11.936571+00:00"}