{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C","short_pith_number":"pith:JR3YZWAJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4c778cd809b4f2cb76bd696dbe8fede0a41a7c7176745452f7405294772b73da","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1906.00182","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Average-case Analysis of the Assignment Problem with Independent Preferences","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Jie Zhang, Yansong Gao","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T08:29:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"The fundamental assignment problem is in search of welfare maximization mechanisms to allocate items to agents when the private preferences over indivisible items are provided by self-interested agents. The mainstream mechanism \\textit{Random Priority} is asymptotically the best mechanism for this purpose, when comparing its welfare to the optimal social welfare using the canonical \\textit{worst-case approximation ratio}. Despite its popularity, the efficiency loss indicated by the worst-case ratio does not have a constant bound. Recently, [Deng, Gao, Zhang 2017] show that when the agents' pre"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1906.00182","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T08:29:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"35838f92ca5338cc25cad5cdb7637d9ff59b37636566b228a516dd151e47199d","abstract_canon_sha256":"dc2e4e5a96f5a7062f224ce5e1df873823cf80ae33ee14dfb7aa9e0a84ddabc3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:44:27.893479Z","signature_b64":"36ZHiAguMBFxZbrDHVIC5jWAUdixzzhXGn3GL1rtdps7P4nT/AHZNRGIpoKHoq1bQUPpW7bLMU1D7G3XX8V1BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4c778cd809b4f2cb76bd696dbe8fede0a41a7c7176745452f7405294772b73da","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:44:27.892844Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:44:27.892844Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Average-case Analysis of the Assignment Problem with Independent Preferences","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Jie Zhang, Yansong Gao","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T08:29:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"The fundamental assignment problem is in search of welfare maximization mechanisms to allocate items to agents when the private preferences over indivisible items are provided by self-interested agents. The mainstream mechanism \\textit{Random Priority} is asymptotically the best mechanism for this purpose, when comparing its welfare to the optimal social welfare using the canonical \\textit{worst-case approximation ratio}. Despite its popularity, the efficiency loss indicated by the worst-case ratio does not have a constant bound. Recently, [Deng, Gao, Zhang 2017] show that when the agents' pre"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1906.00182","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1906.00182","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:44:27.892938+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1906.00182v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:44:27.892938+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1906.00182","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:44:27.892938+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JR3YZWAJWTZM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:21.387695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:21.387695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JR3YZWAJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:21.387695+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JR3YZWAJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JR3YZWAJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1906.00182&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JR3YZWAJWTZMW5V5NFW35D7N4C/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:44:27.892938+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:44:27.892938+00:00"}