{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4","short_pith_number":"pith:JS7GDTOE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4cbe61cdc423967b0673126e5e7253cf0b283a56987c22925abcff3b144bd2ab","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1909.00218","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Epistemic Uncertainty Sampling","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Eyke H\\\"ullermeier, S\\'ebastien Destercke, Vu-Linh Nguyen","submitted_at":"2019-08-31T14:04:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Various strategies for active learning have been proposed in the machine learning literature. In uncertainty sampling, which is among the most popular approaches, the active learner sequentially queries the label of those instances for which its current prediction is maximally uncertain. The predictions as well as the measures used to quantify the degree of uncertainty, such as entropy, are almost exclusively of a probabilistic nature. In this paper, we advocate a distinction between two different types of uncertainty, referred to as epistemic and aleatoric, in the context of active learning. "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1909.00218","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2019-08-31T14:04:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"066c0233c16417b04510ade4d9df075a5cac1deeac884c2eb027a64bb2078958","abstract_canon_sha256":"f5b09a7092e2f8401e2163eb3a42852ceb98692dc16f0d33be6c534e9d87eb03"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907417Z","signature_b64":"hFMS0pJN7caRE/+u13uV2Ovc5gVBOgMi1y5qZPnisoArj6E2Xj8kFf0kSYueqDSBBg50rHS/tBW8/YdcvpSeDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4cbe61cdc423967b0673126e5e7253cf0b283a56987c22925abcff3b144bd2ab","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907071Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907071Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Epistemic Uncertainty Sampling","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Eyke H\\\"ullermeier, S\\'ebastien Destercke, Vu-Linh Nguyen","submitted_at":"2019-08-31T14:04:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Various strategies for active learning have been proposed in the machine learning literature. In uncertainty sampling, which is among the most popular approaches, the active learner sequentially queries the label of those instances for which its current prediction is maximally uncertain. The predictions as well as the measures used to quantify the degree of uncertainty, such as entropy, are almost exclusively of a probabilistic nature. In this paper, we advocate a distinction between two different types of uncertainty, referred to as epistemic and aleatoric, in the context of active learning. "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1909.00218","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1909.00218/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1909.00218","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907126+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1909.00218v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907126+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1909.00218","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907126+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JS7GDTOEEOLH","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907126+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTT","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907126+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JS7GDTOE","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907126+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08032","citing_title":"Variational Proximal Policy Optimization","ref_index":110,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JS7GDTOE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JS7GDTOE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1909.00218&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JS7GDTOEEOLHWBTTCJXF44STZ4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907126+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:06.907126+00:00"}