{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE","short_pith_number":"pith:JSC7ZYCC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4c85fce042a819532a0f632a1097ec111dbf7334dc8f2e2b55417b9407035acb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.18957","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Comment On \"The Illusion of Thinking\": Reframing the Reasoning Cliff as an Agentic Gap","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Kannan Natarajan, Sheraz Khan, Subha Madhavan","submitted_at":"2025-06-23T17:14:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"The recent work by Shojaee et al. (2025), titled The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity, presents a compelling empirical finding, a reasoning cliff, where the performance of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) collapses beyond a specific complexity threshold, which the authors posit as an intrinsic scaling limitation of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. This commentary, while acknowledging the study's methodological rigor, contends that this conclusion is confounded by experimental artifacts. We argue that the obse"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.18957","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-06-23T17:14:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"079e43b4963bca92fe0daa42250df62f3270f5fc0cfa6efa99926860a16b6c87","abstract_canon_sha256":"08bb388c2a83c3f87f74de84a5b043b3f1d4a5bb472b677ed4b351f95e4b8b73"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205470Z","signature_b64":"01ItayA+xH0EZaCdjm6oS/d21qoqtbmIvNtHqqFXdgcu9olFvIHPSyEFbztmIdLSGfDObLurwH8LzF9ZiTISAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4c85fce042a819532a0f632a1097ec111dbf7334dc8f2e2b55417b9407035acb","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.204968Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.204968Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Comment On \"The Illusion of Thinking\": Reframing the Reasoning Cliff as an Agentic Gap","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Kannan Natarajan, Sheraz Khan, Subha Madhavan","submitted_at":"2025-06-23T17:14:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"The recent work by Shojaee et al. (2025), titled The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity, presents a compelling empirical finding, a reasoning cliff, where the performance of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) collapses beyond a specific complexity threshold, which the authors posit as an intrinsic scaling limitation of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. This commentary, while acknowledging the study's methodological rigor, contends that this conclusion is confounded by experimental artifacts. We argue that the obse"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.18957","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.18957/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.18957","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.18957v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.18957","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JSC7ZYCCVAMV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JSC7ZYCC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205025+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30052","citing_title":"REPOT: Recoverable Program-of-Thought via Checkpoint Repair","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06772","citing_title":"When Does Critique Improve AI-Assisted Theoretical Physics? SCALAR: Structured Critic--Actor Loop for Agentic Reasoning","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JSC7ZYCC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JSC7ZYCC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.18957&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JSC7ZYCCVAMVGKQPMMVBBF7MCE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205025+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:26:07.205025+00:00"}