{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU","short_pith_number":"pith:JSMRKDHI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4c99150ce80fcbec413f36cd6ff3c9051f5ed6b67e089032ef0d77712dc7ad37","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2309.07476","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Causal inference in network experiments: regression-based analysis and design-based properties","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Mengsi Gao, Peng Ding","submitted_at":"2023-09-14T07:29:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Network experiments are powerful tools for studying spillover effects, which avoid endogeneity by randomly assigning treatments to units over networks. However, it is non-trivial to analyze network experiments properly without imposing strong modeling assumptions. We show that regression-based point estimators and standard errors can have strong theoretical guarantees if the regression functions and robust standard errors are carefully specified to accommodate the interference patterns under network experiments. We first recall a well-known result that the H\\'ajek estimator is numerically iden"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2309.07476","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2023-09-14T07:29:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a317f25474bb2a2d932965baeafe78ba23b828c7c524c310cfceead2cd29eee3","abstract_canon_sha256":"b7b33bbe22e9dbbdb3e476e5c7a074789df9879bc0d1ab7eee5a09dc10271419"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.862252Z","signature_b64":"miekWwcaNsTjCg41gQxmzl4xXPBLhZnvTCzWMquHAV5ElhVMQHF3D8au76n6XcSK9UDXGmTfD9KaXyitlOaACA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4c99150ce80fcbec413f36cd6ff3c9051f5ed6b67e089032ef0d77712dc7ad37","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861789Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861789Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Causal inference in network experiments: regression-based analysis and design-based properties","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Mengsi Gao, Peng Ding","submitted_at":"2023-09-14T07:29:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Network experiments are powerful tools for studying spillover effects, which avoid endogeneity by randomly assigning treatments to units over networks. However, it is non-trivial to analyze network experiments properly without imposing strong modeling assumptions. We show that regression-based point estimators and standard errors can have strong theoretical guarantees if the regression functions and robust standard errors are carefully specified to accommodate the interference patterns under network experiments. We first recall a well-known result that the H\\'ajek estimator is numerically iden"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2309.07476","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2309.07476/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2309.07476","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861845+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2309.07476v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861845+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.07476","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861845+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JSMRKDHIB7F6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861845+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861845+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JSMRKDHI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861845+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.03050","citing_title":"Covariate Adjustment Cannot Hurt: Treatment Effect Estimation under Interference with Low-Order Outcome Interactions","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JSMRKDHI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JSMRKDHI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2309.07476&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JSMRKDHIB7F6YQJ7G3GW746JAU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861845+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:16:47.861845+00:00"}