{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW","short_pith_number":"pith:JSRPERV7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4ca2f246bf853fe00ec31d4ed7dbd91dbd3cc79c4262dd4dd72a21ba6b0dc6a4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.01864","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Amy X. Zhang, Inyoung Cheong, King Xia, K.J. Kevin Feng, Quan Ze Chen","submitted_at":"2024-02-02T19:35:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of providing users with advice in a wide range of professional domains, including legal advice. However, relying on LLMs for legal queries raises concerns due to the significant expertise required and the potential real-world consequences of the advice. To explore \\textit{when} and \\textit{why} LLMs should or should not provide advice to users, we conducted workshops with 20 legal experts using methods inspired by case-based reasoning. The provided realistic queries (\"cases\") allowed experts to examine granular, situation-specific concerns "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.01864","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-02-02T19:35:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"cbb1fe68e9c0584c3966430aa5e798095ad2cc566785f0087929aa27451225ed","abstract_canon_sha256":"a018bfafd20310e8bcfb2e02377fa4befd4a2ce44affeed9c0db59d1b9f277d2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464771Z","signature_b64":"xZIRE2PUUWyQxwsrcyhb6GV7IBjmrrmbyvpBt5x5aW30vOcDrTvwR4lunHwQ00t5jo3PTo4gk40iKoim/qY7Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4ca2f246bf853fe00ec31d4ed7dbd91dbd3cc79c4262dd4dd72a21ba6b0dc6a4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464225Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464225Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Amy X. Zhang, Inyoung Cheong, King Xia, K.J. Kevin Feng, Quan Ze Chen","submitted_at":"2024-02-02T19:35:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of providing users with advice in a wide range of professional domains, including legal advice. However, relying on LLMs for legal queries raises concerns due to the significant expertise required and the potential real-world consequences of the advice. To explore \\textit{when} and \\textit{why} LLMs should or should not provide advice to users, we conducted workshops with 20 legal experts using methods inspired by case-based reasoning. The provided realistic queries (\"cases\") allowed experts to examine granular, situation-specific concerns "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.01864","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.01864/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.01864","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.01864v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.01864","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JSRPERV7QU76","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JSRPERV7QU76ADWD","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JSRPERV7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464278+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.14200","citing_title":"ELI-Why: Evaluating the Pedagogical Utility of Language Model Explanations","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JSRPERV7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JSRPERV7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.01864&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JSRPERV7QU76ADWDDVHNPW6ZDW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464278+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:20:02.464278+00:00"}