{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT","short_pith_number":"pith:JSS5AJHV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4ca5d024f53d5fbe9f8567ee6b8768a4f609dcb0652afaf77cc723bf7001f5f2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.14538","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Are free choices absolute, when internalized in Wigner's friend?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Free choices are not absolute when internalized in an extended Wigner's friend scenario under locality.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Laurens Walleghem","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T08:21:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Wigner's thought experiment illustrates quantum theory's measurement problem by considering an observer who measures a quantum system inside a sealed lab, modeled unitarily by an outsider. Recent extensions of this thought experiment, referred to as extended Wigner's friend arguments, question how different observers can reason consistently about each other in quantum setups, and challenge the absoluteness of the outcome value obtained by the friend under a notion of locality. In this work, we present an argument against the absoluteness of free choices under the same notion of locality, using"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.14538","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T08:21:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"967d95281dbe69b2f83006f41545d2d3fb66ccb1cc43c80942240183d1f8ffb0","abstract_canon_sha256":"d2e76f27cee85d736e866833e5868b9252d8680843b3abbe1d8a12d210fcb617"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:05.860656Z","signature_b64":"mgR+07M+XuuHCuIVkCqQooWLOY+/IISfqnzRYLtqu0EQvsfKcEpRas7aZwo2t/bPXcho2cGxtmbwxUdKS6HECQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4ca5d024f53d5fbe9f8567ee6b8768a4f609dcb0652afaf77cc723bf7001f5f2","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:05.859888Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:05.859888Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Are free choices absolute, when internalized in Wigner's friend?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Free choices are not absolute when internalized in an extended Wigner's friend scenario under locality.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Laurens Walleghem","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T08:21:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Wigner's thought experiment illustrates quantum theory's measurement problem by considering an observer who measures a quantum system inside a sealed lab, modeled unitarily by an outsider. Recent extensions of this thought experiment, referred to as extended Wigner's friend arguments, question how different observers can reason consistently about each other in quantum setups, and challenge the absoluteness of the outcome value obtained by the friend under a notion of locality. In this work, we present an argument against the absoluteness of free choices under the same notion of locality, using"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"we present an argument against the absoluteness of free choices under the same notion of locality, using an extended Wigner's friend scenario based on the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph theorem.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The locality notion employed in prior extended Wigner's friend arguments transfers directly to the internal observer's measurement choice without requiring additional assumptions about how free choices are modeled inside the unitary evolution.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Free choices lack absoluteness in an extended Wigner's friend scenario based on the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem under locality.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Free choices are not absolute when internalized in an extended Wigner's friend scenario under locality.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"6ea663100f90147bb38ba8583a7e31096825bb67bb4ba457f36086c49f22060c"},"source":{"id":"2605.14538","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"6e7a9be0-5dea-4969-a777-3fc34aff7f4e","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T01:39:12.744533Z","strongest_claim":"we present an argument against the absoluteness of free choices under the same notion of locality, using an extended Wigner's friend scenario based on the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph theorem.","one_line_summary":"Free choices lack absoluteness in an extended Wigner's friend scenario based on the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem under locality.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The locality notion employed in prior extended Wigner's friend arguments transfers directly to the internal observer's measurement choice without requiring additional assumptions about how free choices are modeled inside the unitary evolution.","pith_extraction_headline":"Free choices are not absolute when internalized in an extended Wigner's friend scenario under locality."},"references":{"count":56,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"tracking assumption","work_id":"5eddf761-7ce5-4a5e-bec7-5dc52ddde950","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1995,"title":"Maudlin, Three measurement problems, Topoi14, 7 (1995)","work_id":"bd447480-1ada-4f59-b8ca-3d9293eb2f18","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2007,"title":"Pitowsky, Quantum mechanics as a theory of probability, inFestschrift in Honor of Jeffrey Bub, Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, edited by W","work_id":"02158820-36dc-4acc-8398-4990ce13bb47","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2010,"title":"J. Bub and I. Pitowsky, Two dogmas about quantum mechanics, inMany Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality, edited by S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent, and D. Wallace (Oxford University Press, 20","work_id":"b056be67-9297-4907-8834-bedee9623e70","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2017,"title":"Brukner, On the quantum measurement problem, Quantum [Un] Speakables II: Half a Century of Bell’s Theorem , 95 (2017)","work_id":"e228aaf6-cb39-4faf-9078-41f0a1febfdb","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":56,"snapshot_sha256":"f3d9d8956a5609291e0261122e85048fc3266ea1c560f705f37486594acb3d00","internal_anchors":3},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"snapshot_sha256":"23aa1f9669f9c417311b455863f7d6d3b19f8ef54c7ae1870e6bd35aa60ae908"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.14538","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:05.860006+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.14538v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:05.860006+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.14538","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:05.860006+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JSS5AJHVHVP3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JSS5AJHVHVP35H4F","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JSS5AJHV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JSS5AJHV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JSS5AJHV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.14538&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JSS5AJHVHVP35H4FM7XGXB3IUT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:05.860006+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:05.860006+00:00"}