{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2","short_pith_number":"pith:JVJNGH2G","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4d52d31f4617a2e30ac458f873eb841eb34e323672096fcf5ef7e9478c94fa4b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.09022","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Guizhen Chen, Lidong Bing, Liying Cheng, Luu Anh Tuan","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T15:12:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Computational argumentation has become an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence. It is an emerging research field in natural language processing that attracts increasing attention. Research on computational argumentation mainly involves two types of tasks: argument mining and argument generation. As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding context and generating natural language, it is worthwhile to evaluate the performance of LLMs on diverse computational argumentation tasks. This work aims t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.09022","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T15:12:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"836d749c659d1fabecd49043d88fa15496a02389b07c94764e096e16e090bbb5","abstract_canon_sha256":"95800d812ff0f4e2d91136feff9e6aa039d1d2834660de779e6fec1eb7bb4c90"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.095033Z","signature_b64":"yUNeT9GA14lZmE4HZkhs9JKLCISwtRijw4xMiL+k5cpLxZTLZLR7fJShq+TnOO5cSY/revunkUMSJ+v57J8cAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4d52d31f4617a2e30ac458f873eb841eb34e323672096fcf5ef7e9478c94fa4b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094556Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094556Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Guizhen Chen, Lidong Bing, Liying Cheng, Luu Anh Tuan","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T15:12:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Computational argumentation has become an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence. It is an emerging research field in natural language processing that attracts increasing attention. Research on computational argumentation mainly involves two types of tasks: argument mining and argument generation. As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding context and generating natural language, it is worthwhile to evaluate the performance of LLMs on diverse computational argumentation tasks. This work aims t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.09022","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.09022/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.09022","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094615+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.09022v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094615+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.09022","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094615+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JVJNGH2GC6RO","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094615+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWE","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094615+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JVJNGH2G","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094615+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2405.02079","citing_title":"Argumentative Large Language Models for Explainable and Contestable Claim Verification","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JVJNGH2G"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JVJNGH2G","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.09022&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JVJNGH2GC6ROGCWELD4HH24ED2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094615+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:38:35.094615+00:00"}