{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1996:JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX","short_pith_number":"pith:JWARIRAZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4d8114441993f4e940a4fd44a36bd4c5c45b44b4c6642ee79e8897ede4e6d6a9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-th/9603019","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Lattice effective potential of $(\\lambda\\Phi^4)_4$: nature of the phase transition and bounds on the Higgs mass","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"L. Cosmai, M. Consoli, P. Cea, R. Fiore","submitted_at":"1996-03-05T13:16:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a detailed discussion of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) in $(\\lambda\\Phi^4)_4$. In the usual approach, inspired by perturbation theory, one predicts a second-order phase transition, the Higgs mass $m_h$, related to the value of the renormalized 4-point coupling, gets smaller when increasing the ultraviolet cutoff and this leads to the generally quoted upper bounds $m_h<$700-900 GeV. On the other hand, by exploring the structure of the effective potential in those approximation consistent with `triviality', where the Higgs mass does not represent a measure of any observable inte"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-th/9603019","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"1996-03-05T13:16:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"33960b45eb19f50eb67299cf6667f68aae386ffdb0f3acf5dc156c64a7613707","abstract_canon_sha256":"34a43310b5250267d10f2612ad58e0ad88c3d3cff8182ec2d05eea0b264c10da"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451672Z","signature_b64":"Ebf4O98Tl/7yekxhpUQ0+T7N4lsUn9o8qHtTbUOWv9SgaXopuJWZiQa3vgPFExk74lhr6WA8p3uZSHltYyvbBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4d8114441993f4e940a4fd44a36bd4c5c45b44b4c6642ee79e8897ede4e6d6a9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451249Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451249Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Lattice effective potential of $(\\lambda\\Phi^4)_4$: nature of the phase transition and bounds on the Higgs mass","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"L. Cosmai, M. Consoli, P. Cea, R. Fiore","submitted_at":"1996-03-05T13:16:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a detailed discussion of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) in $(\\lambda\\Phi^4)_4$. In the usual approach, inspired by perturbation theory, one predicts a second-order phase transition, the Higgs mass $m_h$, related to the value of the renormalized 4-point coupling, gets smaller when increasing the ultraviolet cutoff and this leads to the generally quoted upper bounds $m_h<$700-900 GeV. On the other hand, by exploring the structure of the effective potential in those approximation consistent with `triviality', where the Higgs mass does not represent a measure of any observable inte"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-th/9603019","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-th/9603019/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-th/9603019","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-th/9603019v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9603019","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JWARIRAZSP2O","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451306+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JWARIRAZ","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451306+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.02408","citing_title":"The Simplest Dark Matter Model at the Edge of Perturbativity","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JWARIRAZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JWARIRAZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-th/9603019&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JWARIRAZSP2OSQFE7VCKG26UYX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451306+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T14:32:51.451306+00:00"}