{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV","short_pith_number":"pith:JY4O7LS4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4e38efae5c3870ac4ce506fd63109f9d63cb16c283cdb8442cd9d618d924304e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.09236","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"C. Palomba, F. Muciaccia, L. D'Onofrio, L. Mirasola, L. Pierini, M. Di Giovanni, P. Astone, P. Leaci, R. De Rosa, S. Dal Pra, S. D'Antonio, S. Mastrogiovanni","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T15:37:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the $\\mathcal{F}$-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the $\\mathcal{F}$-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-v"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.09236","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T15:37:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"9665d97d5b822cda6a02e8ec146baae9f79bca0e1551bdd9a09f7517ce165bb4","abstract_canon_sha256":"3e7769ebf9551436f03de428a29616d8d84df11c188a28ae4329100e564a401e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181632Z","signature_b64":"3sU5fKKdq70VfNZEqUijD31qXaVMiPF/qJS27RAF2R0S90xCw7FvHQUstTcmsN58u+poIV4nUFP4d/wDhZujBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4e38efae5c3870ac4ce506fd63109f9d63cb16c283cdb8442cd9d618d924304e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181131Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181131Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Two sides of the same coin: the F-statistic and the 5-vector method","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"C. Palomba, F. Muciaccia, L. D'Onofrio, L. Mirasola, L. Pierini, M. Di Giovanni, P. Astone, P. Leaci, R. De Rosa, S. Dal Pra, S. D'Antonio, S. Mastrogiovanni","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T15:37:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"This work explores the relationship between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the $\\mathcal{F}$-statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the $\\mathcal{F}$-statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-v"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.09236","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.09236/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.09236","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181192+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.09236v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181192+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.09236","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181192+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JY4O7LS4HBYK","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181192+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHF","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181192+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JY4O7LS4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181192+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.07662","citing_title":"The G347.3-0.5 outlier from O3: a follow-up case study for continuous gravitational-wave candidates","ref_index":70,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JY4O7LS4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JY4O7LS4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.09236&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JY4O7LS4HBYKYTHFA36WGEE7TV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181192+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:43.181192+00:00"}