{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT","short_pith_number":"pith:JYBPUL2Y","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4e02fa2f58d615456fe7348bc87363acd6b47291d9048c7fdd5fdb02fdfc51a6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2012.10783","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Syntactic categories for dependent type theory: sketching and adequacy","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Daniel Gratzer, Jonathan Sterling","submitted_at":"2020-12-19T21:23:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"We argue that locally Cartesian closed categories form a suitable doctrine for defining dependent type theories, including non-extensional ones. Using the theory of sketches, one may define syntactic categories for type theories in a style that resembles the use of Martin-L\\\"of's Logical Framework, following the \"judgments as types\" principle. The concentration of type theories into their locally Cartesian closed categories of judgments is particularly convenient for proving syntactic metatheorems by semantic means (canonicity, normalization, etc.). Perhaps surprisingly, the notion of a contex"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2012.10783","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2020-12-19T21:23:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"50f08b1b981f0c2aac2911861d4552749028e38081091bd8f52db1f8d58a3b81","abstract_canon_sha256":"d7103b8384b43f7f0d367f74734c2645c1e1254b6f7fc41a8df4ae4d6096755d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459700Z","signature_b64":"4+jgqXN/HIAwPQ91LXg1sOrO6dW+swnHJ8dHtGD0A85jAmPuxc8pCyqc/r+H04YqNrwghZ+7EMZDSCreN7MQAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4e02fa2f58d615456fe7348bc87363acd6b47291d9048c7fdd5fdb02fdfc51a6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459252Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459252Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Syntactic categories for dependent type theory: sketching and adequacy","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Daniel Gratzer, Jonathan Sterling","submitted_at":"2020-12-19T21:23:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"We argue that locally Cartesian closed categories form a suitable doctrine for defining dependent type theories, including non-extensional ones. Using the theory of sketches, one may define syntactic categories for type theories in a style that resembles the use of Martin-L\\\"of's Logical Framework, following the \"judgments as types\" principle. The concentration of type theories into their locally Cartesian closed categories of judgments is particularly convenient for proving syntactic metatheorems by semantic means (canonicity, normalization, etc.). Perhaps surprisingly, the notion of a contex"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2012.10783","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2012.10783/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2012.10783","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2012.10783v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2012.10783","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JYBPUL2Y2YKU","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37H","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JYBPUL2Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459307+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2307.05938","citing_title":"Decalf: A Directed, Effectful Cost-Aware Logical Framework","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JYBPUL2Y"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JYBPUL2Y","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2012.10783&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JYBPUL2Y2YKUK37HGSF4Q43DVT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459307+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:54.459307+00:00"}