{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA","short_pith_number":"pith:K3U4BSMD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"56e9c0c983393cef2a11628de4d06e283181780732e4d448fc913ff7cda7c1f8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.06994","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Change Detection Reality Check","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Anthony Ortiz, Caleb Robinson, Isaac Corley","submitted_at":"2024-02-10T17:02:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"In recent years, there has been an explosion of proposed change detection deep learning architectures in the remote sensing literature. These approaches claim to offer state-of-the-art performance on different standard benchmark datasets. However, has the field truly made significant progress? In this paper we perform experiments which conclude a simple U-Net segmentation baseline without training tricks or complicated architectural changes is still a top performer for the task of change detection."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.06994","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2024-02-10T17:02:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"29bdd8781cf941ade43ca5d9f9af931ac0aeca7ee8fad9133c4b4bd4e41a0fe8","abstract_canon_sha256":"305e8c852ae1f9258d309ffbe67d121ec6013405d40606a7d45d88ccd5c4d159"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.357132Z","signature_b64":"ztyHwaQu2i4nxJ8CxB741gmr7eD4i4zF7iQcj+BldiglNv8eFcz0x56FGs+Fs2sKm5VZhsII7n+Pa3GmKte0Cg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"56e9c0c983393cef2a11628de4d06e283181780732e4d448fc913ff7cda7c1f8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356606Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356606Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Change Detection Reality Check","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Anthony Ortiz, Caleb Robinson, Isaac Corley","submitted_at":"2024-02-10T17:02:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"In recent years, there has been an explosion of proposed change detection deep learning architectures in the remote sensing literature. These approaches claim to offer state-of-the-art performance on different standard benchmark datasets. However, has the field truly made significant progress? In this paper we perform experiments which conclude a simple U-Net segmentation baseline without training tricks or complicated architectural changes is still a top performer for the task of change detection."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.06994","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.06994/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.06994","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.06994v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.06994","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"K3U4BSMDHE6O","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQR","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"K3U4BSMD","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356673+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.03367","citing_title":"Be the Change You Want to See: Revisiting Remote Sensing Change Detection Practices","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K3U4BSMD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K3U4BSMD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.06994&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/K3U4BSMDHE6O6KQRMKG6JUDOFA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356673+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:07:14.356673+00:00"}