{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY","short_pith_number":"pith:K3ZCSNTM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"56f229366ce935b9bffcdb1cb6bf798e28b23f6d400d82e988afb9a1334b5a85","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.26212","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Jordi Marco, Marc Oriol, Quim Motger, Xavier Franch","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T19:26:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is a promising paradigm for improving the accuracy and robustness of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agentic systems. It enables multiple agents to exchange arguments, critique each other's outputs, and iteratively converge towards a solution. However, research remains fragmented, with inconsistent terminology and no rigorous synthesis of MAD design dimensions. We present a systematic literature review characterizing 141 primary studies on MAD. We derive a three-dimensional taxonomy covering debate participants, the interaction mechanisms structuring the exchange, and"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.26212","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T19:26:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"8a719bffcdce950b0f9bab893ef8c56b971523bd16e0c11b694b262bb24df6ca","abstract_canon_sha256":"56070473a6d0b3e3eeb3c31e7c1a78769a2a70925726bb11a7a1bf40207fa68f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"56f229366ce935b9bffcdb1cb6bf798e28b23f6d400d82e988afb9a1334b5a85","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.487087Z","signature_status":"unsigned_v0","first_computed_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.487087Z"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Jordi Marco, Marc Oriol, Quim Motger, Xavier Franch","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T19:26:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is a promising paradigm for improving the accuracy and robustness of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agentic systems. It enables multiple agents to exchange arguments, critique each other's outputs, and iteratively converge towards a solution. However, research remains fragmented, with inconsistent terminology and no rigorous synthesis of MAD design dimensions. We present a systematic literature review characterizing 141 primary studies on MAD. We derive a three-dimensional taxonomy covering debate participants, the interaction mechanisms structuring the exchange, and"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.26212","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.26212/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.26212","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.492167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.26212v1","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.492167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.26212","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.492167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"K3ZCSNTM5E23","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.492167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"K3ZCSNTM5E23TP74","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.492167+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"K3ZCSNTM","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.492167+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K3ZCSNTM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K3ZCSNTM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.26212&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/K3ZCSNTM5E23TP743MOLNP3ZRY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.492167+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:43.492167+00:00"}