{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH","short_pith_number":"pith:K4NK6YOY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"571aaf61d8d9c015e465e37b1a0d8c11e2cd6026dcd241624e0b198ae9d0d511","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.10400","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Self-Reflection Makes Large Language Models Safer, Less Biased, and Ideologically Neutral","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fengyuan Liu, Gregory Eady, Nouar AlDahoul, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki","submitted_at":"2024-06-14T20:07:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Previous studies proposed that the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) can be improved through self-reflection, i.e., letting LLMs reflect on their own output to identify and correct mistakes in the initial responses. However, earlier experiments offer mixed results when it comes to the benefits of self-reflection. Furthermore, prior studies on self-reflection are predominantly concerned with the reasoning capabilities of models, ignoring the potential for self-reflection in safety, bias, and ideological leaning. Here, by conducting a series of experiments testing LLM's self"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.10400","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-14T20:07:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c3d4850501fb6aad24687d7a0c38fd0d8a8bb2139e9e42bc25ac5d7847fb6d23","abstract_canon_sha256":"12cc1837920e58c190be656691c90f37894dc17353e40bfbd0c3fb8db6a96cd3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587753Z","signature_b64":"EPXP5L3bsyvSPZVJeXgUV05208Iw1q0Ie8EoXb/kqc6Qe0u2H4PCjHTrfU/c89Y0quYP5XpljATRc5+FA0sBAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"571aaf61d8d9c015e465e37b1a0d8c11e2cd6026dcd241624e0b198ae9d0d511","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587259Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587259Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Self-Reflection Makes Large Language Models Safer, Less Biased, and Ideologically Neutral","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Fengyuan Liu, Gregory Eady, Nouar AlDahoul, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki","submitted_at":"2024-06-14T20:07:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Previous studies proposed that the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) can be improved through self-reflection, i.e., letting LLMs reflect on their own output to identify and correct mistakes in the initial responses. However, earlier experiments offer mixed results when it comes to the benefits of self-reflection. Furthermore, prior studies on self-reflection are predominantly concerned with the reasoning capabilities of models, ignoring the potential for self-reflection in safety, bias, and ideological leaning. Here, by conducting a series of experiments testing LLM's self"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.10400","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.10400/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.10400","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.10400v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.10400","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"K4NK6YOY3HAB","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"K4NK6YOY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587310+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.05196","citing_title":"Unified Audio Intelligence Without Regressing on Text Intelligence","ref_index":148,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00975","citing_title":"Lost in Delusion: Examining LLM Safety Under User Delusions and Distress","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.22202","citing_title":"Library Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Code: A Risk Analysis Grounded in Developer Queries","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.18847","citing_title":"Failure Makes the Agent Stronger: Enhancing Accuracy through Structured Reflection for Reliable Tool Interactions","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.21697","citing_title":"Structured Visual Narratives Undermine Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18500","citing_title":"QRAFTI: An Agentic Framework for Empirical Research in Quantitative Finance","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K4NK6YOY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K4NK6YOY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.10400&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/K4NK6YOY3HABLZDF4N5RUDMMCH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587310+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:41.587310+00:00"}