{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU","short_pith_number":"pith:K62LPYJW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"57b4b7e136044f83da6f059a8e5fc82d09e925f14565f2878aced61e799f4b8a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2508.06326","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A \"good regulator theorem\" for embodied agents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SY","eess.SY"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Manuel Baltieri, Martin Biehl, Matteo Capucci, Nathaniel Virgo","submitted_at":"2025-08-04T16:11:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a classic paper, Conant and Ashby claimed that \"every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system.\" Artificial Life has produced many examples of systems that perform tasks with apparently no model in sight; these suggest Conant and Ashby's theorem doesn't easily generalise beyond its restricted setup. Nevertheless, here we show that a similar intuition can be fleshed out in a different way: whenever an agent is able to perform a regulation task, it is possible for an observer to interpret it as having \"beliefs\" about its environment, which it \"updates\" in response to sensory "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2508.06326","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-08-04T16:11:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SY","eess.SY"],"title_canon_sha256":"2db7891bbffcd97c9ef30cd8c786078bd80b56ecbf0d4d6dfd7ba01c07d8f5aa","abstract_canon_sha256":"37d02d14ab8bf9e7aa472fd6acefae258f50bac4cb067481a2309852c42084ec"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.698467Z","signature_b64":"qccxQBiwgfkmWJqbthH2d7dIyZ3+DqkQSTvmjg7NieQ9NjZStWiZuBuaveU2Mv3GWkYRDvOEiiq/79479pt2AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"57b4b7e136044f83da6f059a8e5fc82d09e925f14565f2878aced61e799f4b8a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697936Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697936Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A \"good regulator theorem\" for embodied agents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SY","eess.SY"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Manuel Baltieri, Martin Biehl, Matteo Capucci, Nathaniel Virgo","submitted_at":"2025-08-04T16:11:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a classic paper, Conant and Ashby claimed that \"every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system.\" Artificial Life has produced many examples of systems that perform tasks with apparently no model in sight; these suggest Conant and Ashby's theorem doesn't easily generalise beyond its restricted setup. Nevertheless, here we show that a similar intuition can be fleshed out in a different way: whenever an agent is able to perform a regulation task, it is possible for an observer to interpret it as having \"beliefs\" about its environment, which it \"updates\" in response to sensory "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2508.06326","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2508.06326/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2508.06326","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2508.06326v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2508.06326","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"K62LPYJWARHY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"K62LPYJWARHYHWTP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"K62LPYJW","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697994+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00941","citing_title":"From Runtime Records to Legal Findings: An Evidentiary-Adequacy Criterion for Agentic AI Oversight","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K62LPYJW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K62LPYJW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2508.06326&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/K62LPYJWARHYHWTPAWNI4X6IFU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697994+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:00.697994+00:00"}