{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT","short_pith_number":"pith:K73J2LUQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"57f69d2e905c0396bb34764aac23bdaccf488efc0e2a1f6c15bd13265d7c2f94","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.16336","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Alexander Fishkov, Eric Moulines, Maxim Panov, Mohsen Guizani, Souhaib Ben Taieb, Victor Dheur, Vincent Plassier","submitted_at":"2025-02-22T19:54:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a new method for generating confidence sets within the split conformal prediction framework. Our method performs a trainable transformation of any given conformity score to improve conditional coverage while ensuring exact marginal coverage. The transformation is based on an estimate of the conditional quantile of conformity scores. The resulting method is particularly beneficial for constructing adaptive confidence sets in multi-output problems where standard conformal quantile regression approaches have limited applicability. We develop a theoretical bound that captures the influe"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.16336","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2025-02-22T19:54:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","math.ST","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"b624f288bc464ad6aca4dea919f1e3f09c0e3cdef9d17eea74c4c2e070386101","abstract_canon_sha256":"a5bec8754b45d782d405d6545eaea048fa242940b5f1ac2a644ad1ae42f1a86b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027992Z","signature_b64":"K07oc7TwXgcBZbB3VSrHOdIIJ5DgxtYTTPDBMwrIOX6ZlEYZg01s7w/tvM+BUUgjE+8lloVJMEV7p1C3TAxQAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"57f69d2e905c0396bb34764aac23bdaccf488efc0e2a1f6c15bd13265d7c2f94","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027475Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027475Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Alexander Fishkov, Eric Moulines, Maxim Panov, Mohsen Guizani, Souhaib Ben Taieb, Victor Dheur, Vincent Plassier","submitted_at":"2025-02-22T19:54:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a new method for generating confidence sets within the split conformal prediction framework. Our method performs a trainable transformation of any given conformity score to improve conditional coverage while ensuring exact marginal coverage. The transformation is based on an estimate of the conditional quantile of conformity scores. The resulting method is particularly beneficial for constructing adaptive confidence sets in multi-output problems where standard conformal quantile regression approaches have limited applicability. We develop a theoretical bound that captures the influe"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.16336","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.16336/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.16336","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027537+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.16336v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027537+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.16336","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027537+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"K73J2LUQLQBZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027537+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"K73J2LUQLQBZNOZU","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027537+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"K73J2LUQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027537+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29403","citing_title":"Self-Organized Conformal Prediction: Reducing Regional Coverage Gaps with Unsupervised Group Discovery","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.25852","citing_title":"A Post-Processing Conformal Prediction Approach for Conditional Coverage via Pivotal Scores","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30807","citing_title":"Conformal Reliability: A New Evaluation Metric for Conditional Generation","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K73J2LUQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K73J2LUQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.16336&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/K73J2LUQLQBZNOZUOZFKYI55VT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027537+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:56:02.027537+00:00"}