{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455","short_pith_number":"pith:K7GDDCFI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"57cc3188a84108964cd834d04c21bcef522d4559c537b8bdd63f4bf507ec2de6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.17620","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Case Study of Scalable Content Annotation Using Multi-LLM Consensus and Human Review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Aaron Quigley, Gelareh Mohammadi, Jieshan Chen, Mingyue Yuan, Zhenchang Xing","submitted_at":"2025-03-22T02:32:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Content annotation at scale remains challenging, requiring substantial human expertise and effort. This paper presents a case study in code documentation analysis, where we explore the balance between automation efficiency and annotation accuracy. We present MCHR (Multi-LLM Consensus with Human Review), a novel semi-automated framework that enhances annotation scalability through the systematic integration of multiple LLMs and targeted human review. Our framework introduces a structured consensus-building mechanism among LLMs and an adaptive review protocol that strategically engages human exp"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.17620","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2025-03-22T02:32:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d2a1a4169d3ae1ac72d88e538fae96c6add9e94bb0016b05e2ac7af0205ad5ad","abstract_canon_sha256":"83f98e73f44e1b32d6065e8cb1a0d0efc2147ce64f937195ffce3cf0b17eab21"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.017412Z","signature_b64":"Oxby1uA259mMl03gWZsIsmweLuN4EVH+OI9emMlulxUBLaE0V8MztMFGFqLIq9vI9Cqybd6slnC3yMKArKbvAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"57cc3188a84108964cd834d04c21bcef522d4559c537b8bdd63f4bf507ec2de6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016918Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016918Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Case Study of Scalable Content Annotation Using Multi-LLM Consensus and Human Review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Aaron Quigley, Gelareh Mohammadi, Jieshan Chen, Mingyue Yuan, Zhenchang Xing","submitted_at":"2025-03-22T02:32:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Content annotation at scale remains challenging, requiring substantial human expertise and effort. This paper presents a case study in code documentation analysis, where we explore the balance between automation efficiency and annotation accuracy. We present MCHR (Multi-LLM Consensus with Human Review), a novel semi-automated framework that enhances annotation scalability through the systematic integration of multiple LLMs and targeted human review. Our framework introduces a structured consensus-building mechanism among LLMs and an adaptive review protocol that strategically engages human exp"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.17620","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.17620/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.17620","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016978+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.17620v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016978+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.17620","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016978+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"K7GDDCFIIEEJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016978+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016978+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"K7GDDCFI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016978+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.00052","citing_title":"AI-assisted Protocol Information Extraction For Improved Accuracy and Efficiency in Clinical Trial Workflows","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455","json":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K7GDDCFI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K7GDDCFI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.17620&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/K7GDDCFIIEEJMTGYGTIEYIN455/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016978+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:54:45.016978+00:00"}