{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG","short_pith_number":"pith:K7Q2URNZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"57e1aa45b9792d94812a0969842a485992e749afbb6a56d0ed40b0b4e3fc4529","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2512.08090","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Two-infall Model Revisited: Constraints on Milky Way Bulge Assembly from >30,000 Galactic Chemical Evolution Models and Machine Learning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.SR"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","authors_text":"Christian I. Johnson, Jamie Tayar, Meridith Joyce, Niall Miller, R. Michael Rich, Thomas Trueman","submitted_at":"2025-12-08T22:57:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"We constrain the formation history of the Milky Way bulge using a two-infall galactic chemical evolution (GCE) algorithm implemented in the N'OMEGA+ code. We recover a best-fit scenario in which the bulge forms through an early, rapid starburst ($t_1 \\sim 0.1$ Gyr, $\\tau_1 \\sim 0.09$ Gyr, and star formation efficiency (SFE) $\\sim 3~\\mathrm{Gyr}^{-1}$), followed by a delayed, lower-mass second infall ($t_2 \\sim 5.1$ Gyr, $\\tau_2 \\sim 1.7$ Gyr, and $\\sigma_2 \\sim 0.69$). Our model adopts mass- and metallicity-dependent nucleosynthetic yields from modern stellar grids and explores a wide GCE para"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2512.08090","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","submitted_at":"2025-12-08T22:57:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.SR"],"title_canon_sha256":"bba805ed65bd2bedd594258467347b0e812d118e85cccd69c488b37dc324e6b3","abstract_canon_sha256":"fb7ee6f2f9f1feb5c2957ac08c6d19c0f5264d1a12c463a577ba61b178fb2b3d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.129257Z","signature_b64":"56ld29+uwvte1G57HzBU18W2NYWTo73J+C/jWekmCVApfjwOuXKZ2MTorCyTwvKczqeaJTe9xdqdDOcqEJ6JBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"57e1aa45b9792d94812a0969842a485992e749afbb6a56d0ed40b0b4e3fc4529","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.127751Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.127751Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Two-infall Model Revisited: Constraints on Milky Way Bulge Assembly from >30,000 Galactic Chemical Evolution Models and Machine Learning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.SR"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","authors_text":"Christian I. Johnson, Jamie Tayar, Meridith Joyce, Niall Miller, R. Michael Rich, Thomas Trueman","submitted_at":"2025-12-08T22:57:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"We constrain the formation history of the Milky Way bulge using a two-infall galactic chemical evolution (GCE) algorithm implemented in the N'OMEGA+ code. We recover a best-fit scenario in which the bulge forms through an early, rapid starburst ($t_1 \\sim 0.1$ Gyr, $\\tau_1 \\sim 0.09$ Gyr, and star formation efficiency (SFE) $\\sim 3~\\mathrm{Gyr}^{-1}$), followed by a delayed, lower-mass second infall ($t_2 \\sim 5.1$ Gyr, $\\tau_2 \\sim 1.7$ Gyr, and $\\sigma_2 \\sim 0.69$). Our model adopts mass- and metallicity-dependent nucleosynthetic yields from modern stellar grids and explores a wide GCE para"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2512.08090","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2512.08090/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2512.08090","created_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.128695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2512.08090v2","created_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.128695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2512.08090","created_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.128695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"K7Q2URNZPEWZ","created_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.128695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJK","created_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.128695+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"K7Q2URNZ","created_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.128695+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.24383","citing_title":"Evaluating the Sensitivity of the Age Inferences of Red Giant Stars to Machine Learning Methodology","ref_index":79,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K7Q2URNZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/K7Q2URNZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2512.08090&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/K7Q2URNZPEWZJAJKBFUYIKSILG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.128695+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-28T00:21:33.128695+00:00"}