{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ","short_pith_number":"pith:KCQSR2B3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"50a128e83bb9f9717dc964a1227d4f625e1c2927374ab7a4e38e8d75ea09091c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.03698","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bridging constrained random-phase approximation and linear response theory for computing Hubbard parameters","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.str-el","authors_text":"Alberto Carta, Claude Ederer, Iurii Timrov, Sophie Beck","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T17:11:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"The predictive accuracy of popular extensions to density-functional theory (DFT) such as DFT+U and DFT plus dynamical mean-field theory (DFT+DMFT) hinges on using realistic values for the screened Coulomb interaction U. Here, we present a systematic comparison of the two most widely used approaches to compute this parameter, i.e. linear response theory (LRT) and the constrained random-phase approximation (cRPA), using a unified framework based on the use of maximally localized Wannier functions. We show that the U in LRT and cRPA can differ as much as 30%. We demonstrate that this discrepancy "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.03698","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cond-mat.str-el","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T17:11:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"51ef5a0d17cb9879e25ada7f92bd61dc3a7db1071c8cd14a6b33611ca0d523f3","abstract_canon_sha256":"9b96f4c881a18faa44f7131988b8e2a7f310ef6e10266ac1a38cbeafe0b7da5c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349631Z","signature_b64":"rIuHVE4in8PV0iUS5HMMVUHl5FRVf8lANa0cwVPlT7AjrGh0tVq60q2EQQEFeLcRujU0lj+97+STCDTSeHarCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"50a128e83bb9f9717dc964a1227d4f625e1c2927374ab7a4e38e8d75ea09091c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.348660Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.348660Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bridging constrained random-phase approximation and linear response theory for computing Hubbard parameters","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.str-el","authors_text":"Alberto Carta, Claude Ederer, Iurii Timrov, Sophie Beck","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T17:11:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"The predictive accuracy of popular extensions to density-functional theory (DFT) such as DFT+U and DFT plus dynamical mean-field theory (DFT+DMFT) hinges on using realistic values for the screened Coulomb interaction U. Here, we present a systematic comparison of the two most widely used approaches to compute this parameter, i.e. linear response theory (LRT) and the constrained random-phase approximation (cRPA), using a unified framework based on the use of maximally localized Wannier functions. We show that the U in LRT and cRPA can differ as much as 30%. We demonstrate that this discrepancy "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.03698","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.03698/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.03698","created_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.03698v2","created_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.03698","created_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KCQSR2B3XH4X","created_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJ","created_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KCQSR2B3","created_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349098+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.16916","citing_title":"Exact downfolding and its perturbative approximation","ref_index":75,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25706","citing_title":"Validity of DFT+U band gaps in all its known functional forms","ref_index":169,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06927","citing_title":"Development of ab initio Hubbard parameter calculation schemes in the k-point sampling real-time TDDFT program in CP2K","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KCQSR2B3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KCQSR2B3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.03698&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQSR2B3XH4XC7OJMSQSE7KPMJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349098+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-29T00:24:31.349098+00:00"}