{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2","short_pith_number":"pith:KCQTZNNB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"50a13cb5a1a4f1a6ed253a698dc1fc36877aac53dd26b9456513144acef9548f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.01706","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Polarity Calibration for Opinion Summarization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dong Yu, Kaiqiang Song, Ruihong Huang, Sangwoo Cho, Xiaoyang Wang, Yuanyuan Lei","submitted_at":"2024-04-02T07:43:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Opinion summarization is automatically generating summaries from a variety of subjective information, such as product reviews or political opinions. The challenge of opinions summarization lies in presenting divergent or even conflicting opinions. We conduct an analysis of previous summarization models, which reveals their inclination to amplify the polarity bias, emphasizing the majority opinions while ignoring the minority opinions. To address this issue and make the summarizer express both sides of opinions, we introduce the concept of polarity calibration, which aims to align the polarity "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.01706","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-04-02T07:43:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2e0453e7df1b4663334e60f2ef6b3f71f17effebc0358ce8646d01ece4939ae8","abstract_canon_sha256":"a6ea5824e363a2ada110d19f804fce2158a33e0938bde889f21acd521e15eb96"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477897Z","signature_b64":"ODMg/AfKCFxevuqEdoG+RB/r6Ov6qVCmG4lKZCl+kkFiGPrbs04bNfzlBWKprOaFEDOZNvdo8a5u6L3AE0/XBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"50a13cb5a1a4f1a6ed253a698dc1fc36877aac53dd26b9456513144acef9548f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477467Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477467Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Polarity Calibration for Opinion Summarization","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dong Yu, Kaiqiang Song, Ruihong Huang, Sangwoo Cho, Xiaoyang Wang, Yuanyuan Lei","submitted_at":"2024-04-02T07:43:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Opinion summarization is automatically generating summaries from a variety of subjective information, such as product reviews or political opinions. The challenge of opinions summarization lies in presenting divergent or even conflicting opinions. We conduct an analysis of previous summarization models, which reveals their inclination to amplify the polarity bias, emphasizing the majority opinions while ignoring the minority opinions. To address this issue and make the summarizer express both sides of opinions, we introduce the concept of polarity calibration, which aims to align the polarity "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.01706","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.01706/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.01706","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477524+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.01706v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477524+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.01706","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477524+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KCQTZNNBUTY2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477524+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JF","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477524+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KCQTZNNB","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477524+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.07479","citing_title":"Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KCQTZNNB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KCQTZNNB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.01706&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KCQTZNNBUTY2N3JFHJUY3QP4G2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477524+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:03:18.477524+00:00"}