{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH","short_pith_number":"pith:KDZDWLBM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"50f23b2c2ca42a77c4487651408003a9cc3a086ca0a468b731ebbcf99cd0fd3e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.10789","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can Large Language Models Trade? Testing Financial Theories with LLM Agents in Market Simulations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC","q-fin.GN","q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.CP","authors_text":"Alejandro Lopez-Lira","submitted_at":"2025-04-15T01:18:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper presents a realistic simulated stock market where large language models (LLMs) act as heterogeneous competing trading agents. The open-source framework incorporates a persistent order book with market and limit orders, partial fills, dividends, and equilibrium clearing alongside agents with varied strategies, information sets, and endowments. Agents submit standardized decisions using structured outputs and function calls while expressing their reasoning in natural language. Three findings emerge: First, LLMs demonstrate consistent strategy adherence and can function as value invest"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.10789","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.CP","submitted_at":"2025-04-15T01:18:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC","q-fin.GN","q-fin.TR"],"title_canon_sha256":"6bd87cb2b4e4558326426ae92d2c6ae6577e05a79dfc08986e43f89f66a7d484","abstract_canon_sha256":"21badc7ce542b3d95efc0221d2c3dfc9aa8cb65c912451b3b8d6756fc1da1e89"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.385010Z","signature_b64":"cI8fdG//zsE9Cgnm8NJyeDwMtWlTY5gFQSNRuo/JkNqiF6vqVwkckOEStT7oc87P/c4v9MOYugw6WdQJmMDTBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"50f23b2c2ca42a77c4487651408003a9cc3a086ca0a468b731ebbcf99cd0fd3e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384553Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384553Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can Large Language Models Trade? Testing Financial Theories with LLM Agents in Market Simulations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC","q-fin.GN","q-fin.TR"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.CP","authors_text":"Alejandro Lopez-Lira","submitted_at":"2025-04-15T01:18:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper presents a realistic simulated stock market where large language models (LLMs) act as heterogeneous competing trading agents. The open-source framework incorporates a persistent order book with market and limit orders, partial fills, dividends, and equilibrium clearing alongside agents with varied strategies, information sets, and endowments. Agents submit standardized decisions using structured outputs and function calls while expressing their reasoning in natural language. Three findings emerge: First, LLMs demonstrate consistent strategy adherence and can function as value invest"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.10789","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.10789/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.10789","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.10789v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.10789","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KDZDWLBMUQVH","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KDZDWLBM","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384608+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08285","citing_title":"Beyond Agent Architecture: Execution Assumptions and Reproducibility in LLM-Based Trading Systems","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27896","citing_title":"FinBoardBench: Benchmarking Dynamic Wealth Management and Strategic Financial Reasoning of LLMs via Board Game Simulations","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.02921","citing_title":"Debiasing LLMs by Fine-tuning","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18500","citing_title":"QRAFTI: An Agentic Framework for Empirical Research in Quantitative Finance","ref_index":84,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KDZDWLBM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KDZDWLBM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.10789&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KDZDWLBMUQVHPRCIOZIUBAADVH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384608+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:49:24.384608+00:00"}