{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT","short_pith_number":"pith:KE2XMGAH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5135761807acefb00a3c8a90e3253c3cfec9487e07e6118e3e6b1bcf41066e3c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2512.13629","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Empirical comparison of win ratio and joint frailty models for recurrent event endpoints with applications in oncology and cardiology","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Adrien Oru\\'e, Carine Bellera, Derek Dinart, Laurent Billot, Virginie Rondeau","submitted_at":"2025-12-15T18:26:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"Composite endpoints that combine recurrent non-fatal events with a terminal event are increasingly used in randomized clinical trials, yet conventional time-to-first event analyses may obscure clinically relevant information. We compared two statistical frameworks tailored to such endpoints: the joint frailty model (JFM) and the last-event assisted recurrent-event win ratio (LWR). The JFM specifies proportional hazards for the recurrent and terminal events linked through a shared frailty, yielding covariate-adjusted, component-specific hazard ratios that account for informative recurrences and"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2512.13629","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2025-12-15T18:26:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3433d35834c924302e981eec81b31b6096066bc8d14bcd45caaf204854c3977f","abstract_canon_sha256":"a71904c71e78b97a3e9188fe3a88cddb20760c3eba201fe7bf7ee773d3eb9edb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.326874Z","signature_b64":"GSqf3n4RKZd/pmJuk4MeEPSWV/DkRkign7RDjDV1FF61zY9VUX2EL88AkyE8LNRdkJ1qYEpp9l1te0P/Kk+iDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5135761807acefb00a3c8a90e3253c3cfec9487e07e6118e3e6b1bcf41066e3c","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325762Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325762Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Empirical comparison of win ratio and joint frailty models for recurrent event endpoints with applications in oncology and cardiology","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Adrien Oru\\'e, Carine Bellera, Derek Dinart, Laurent Billot, Virginie Rondeau","submitted_at":"2025-12-15T18:26:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"Composite endpoints that combine recurrent non-fatal events with a terminal event are increasingly used in randomized clinical trials, yet conventional time-to-first event analyses may obscure clinically relevant information. We compared two statistical frameworks tailored to such endpoints: the joint frailty model (JFM) and the last-event assisted recurrent-event win ratio (LWR). The JFM specifies proportional hazards for the recurrent and terminal events linked through a shared frailty, yielding covariate-adjusted, component-specific hazard ratios that account for informative recurrences and"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2512.13629","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2512.13629/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2512.13629","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325928+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2512.13629v2","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325928+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2512.13629","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325928+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KE2XMGAHVTX3","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325928+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325928+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KE2XMGAH","created_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325928+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08101","citing_title":"Multi-Dimensional Composite Endpoint Analysis via the Choquet Integral: Block Recurrent Encoding and Comparative Advantage Mapping","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KE2XMGAH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KE2XMGAH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2512.13629&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KE2XMGAHVTX3ACR4RKIOGJJ4HT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325928+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-10T01:09:50.325928+00:00"}