{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR","short_pith_number":"pith:KH24IQWZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"51f5c442d99b3ca232f57f067b08a674720ee37e2d4379f119ba4649d27bac42","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.22474","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When to Act, Ask, or Learn: Uncertainty-Aware Policy Steering","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"A robot policy can decide to act, query for clarification, or request human intervention by calibrating its uncertainty estimates with conformal prediction.","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.RO","authors_text":"Andrea Bajcsy, Jessie Yuan, Yilin Wu","submitted_at":"2026-02-25T23:23:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Policy steering is an emerging way to adapt robot behaviors at deployment-time: a learned verifier analyzes low-level action samples proposed by a pre-trained policy (e.g., diffusion policy) and selects only those aligned with the task. While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are promising general-purpose verifiers due to their reasoning capabilities, existing frameworks often assume these models are well-calibrated. In practice, the overconfident judgment from VLM can degrade the steering performance under both high-level semantic uncertainty in task specifications and low-level action uncertaint"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.22474","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.RO","submitted_at":"2026-02-25T23:23:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"49573dece0fb15d220bb8b69150f477fec2aa11847b1e7c433ebfdb23ffe5a11","abstract_canon_sha256":"2a17b09d455fb1e3e82854d98f4d26ba4fdbf72bf557d9d09941097454e0e461"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.519769Z","signature_b64":"Nwg/DIL4sYIIrA7MkyJljr/gzXtrERTKMjunHtY2rVP0OQIaWVQXdMov6oYZheXsx2hjaDENXbB/ot2LtmqjDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"51f5c442d99b3ca232f57f067b08a674720ee37e2d4379f119ba4649d27bac42","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.518995Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.518995Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When to Act, Ask, or Learn: Uncertainty-Aware Policy Steering","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"A robot policy can decide to act, query for clarification, or request human intervention by calibrating its uncertainty estimates with conformal prediction.","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.RO","authors_text":"Andrea Bajcsy, Jessie Yuan, Yilin Wu","submitted_at":"2026-02-25T23:23:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Policy steering is an emerging way to adapt robot behaviors at deployment-time: a learned verifier analyzes low-level action samples proposed by a pre-trained policy (e.g., diffusion policy) and selects only those aligned with the task. While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are promising general-purpose verifiers due to their reasoning capabilities, existing frameworks often assume these models are well-calibrated. In practice, the overconfident judgment from VLM can degrade the steering performance under both high-level semantic uncertainty in task specifications and low-level action uncertaint"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We propose uncertainty-aware policy steering (UPS), a framework that jointly reasons about semantic task uncertainty and low-level action feasibility, and selects an uncertainty resolution strategy: execute a high-confidence action, clarify task ambiguity via natural language queries, or ask for action interventions to correct the low-level policy when it is deemed incapable at the task. We leverage conformal prediction to calibrate the composition of the VLM and the pre-trained base policy, providing statistical assurances that the verifier selects the correct strategy.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The assumption that conformal prediction applied to the composition of the VLM verifier and pre-trained policy will yield valid statistical guarantees for strategy selection in practice, and that residual learning from collected interventions will meaningfully improve policy capability without requiring extensive additional data or causing instability.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"UPS framework uses conformal prediction to calibrate VLM verifiers for choosing between high-confidence action execution, natural language task queries, or policy interventions, then applies residual learning from interventions to continually improve the base policy with minimal feedback.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"A robot policy can decide to act, query for clarification, or request human intervention by calibrating its uncertainty estimates with conformal prediction.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"e09fcbb49e3f20d87a615321b15f8e5b859eec2f1e8c75398e0f6eec1237212e"},"source":{"id":"2602.22474","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"7639c9bb-f979-46d2-b9c9-d6ec4a439690","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T18:57:37.017059Z","strongest_claim":"We propose uncertainty-aware policy steering (UPS), a framework that jointly reasons about semantic task uncertainty and low-level action feasibility, and selects an uncertainty resolution strategy: execute a high-confidence action, clarify task ambiguity via natural language queries, or ask for action interventions to correct the low-level policy when it is deemed incapable at the task. We leverage conformal prediction to calibrate the composition of the VLM and the pre-trained base policy, providing statistical assurances that the verifier selects the correct strategy.","one_line_summary":"UPS framework uses conformal prediction to calibrate VLM verifiers for choosing between high-confidence action execution, natural language task queries, or policy interventions, then applies residual learning from interventions to continually improve the base policy with minimal feedback.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The assumption that conformal prediction applied to the composition of the VLM verifier and pre-trained policy will yield valid statistical guarantees for strategy selection in practice, and that residual learning from collected interventions will meaningfully improve policy capability without requiring extensive additional data or causing instability.","pith_extraction_headline":"A robot policy can decide to act, query for clarification, or request human intervention by calibrating its uncertainty estimates with conformal prediction."},"references":{"count":100,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2026,"title":"Let’s think in two steps: Mitigating agreement bias in mllms with self- grounded verification","work_id":"d77936c7-a755-414b-b575-9253482ef89c","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Con- formal prediction: A gentle introduction.Foundations and trends® in machine learning, 16(4):494–591, 2023","work_id":"d2020e12-c021-48cd-8971-496841e83785","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey","work_id":"1902954e-ed65-4b00-9956-5cc759b8ef40","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"2404.18930","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"","year":2007,"title":"Goal inference as inverse planning","work_id":"138f104d-c7b6-4402-8533-ad2ac710362d","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"$\\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control","work_id":"f790abdc-a796-482f-a40d-f8ee035ecfc2","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"2410.24164","is_internal_anchor":true}],"resolved_work":100,"snapshot_sha256":"c0c0c580b1d27e91570a91229fb7c95d27709516435c72183b0af033695ac3f8","internal_anchors":5},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.22474","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.519129+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.22474v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.519129+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.22474","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.519129+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KH24IQWZTM6K","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KH24IQWZTM6KEMXV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KH24IQWZ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KH24IQWZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KH24IQWZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.22474&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KH24IQWZTM6KEMXVP4DHWCFGOR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.519129+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.519129+00:00"}