{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN","short_pith_number":"pith:KHROERUR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"51e2e24691ca3adcda71d4f44c2457136ffba665107160fb3a777ddeaf57251c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.13919","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LLM Agent Honeypot: Monitoring AI Hacking Agents in the Wild","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Dmitrii Volkov, Reworr","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T09:25:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Attacks powered by Large Language Model (LLM) agents represent a growing threat to modern cybersecurity. To address this concern, we present LLM Honeypot, a system designed to monitor autonomous AI hacking agents. By augmenting a standard SSH honeypot with prompt injection and time-based analysis techniques, our framework aims to distinguish LLM agents among all attackers. Over a trial deployment of about three months in a public environment, we collected 8,130,731 hacking attempts and 8 potential AI agents. Our work demonstrates the emergence of AI-driven threats and their current level of us"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.13919","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T09:25:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"83f8b1c59cabfa250b4178712d677ed5d82796808ac0c1869a9ca08b731ab99b","abstract_canon_sha256":"74c2f97d27663f48c82366630903117291d9dfe0601a55721882bb465cf1266f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383766Z","signature_b64":"3wfhfzQ25yYk6TwC+RyGapGE2YV0IiQcIh6BADXUt4TRlitDnYTpQg56uaqi3cigeYj4eqeoyeyslSHpg3H6CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"51e2e24691ca3adcda71d4f44c2457136ffba665107160fb3a777ddeaf57251c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383300Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383300Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LLM Agent Honeypot: Monitoring AI Hacking Agents in the Wild","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Dmitrii Volkov, Reworr","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T09:25:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Attacks powered by Large Language Model (LLM) agents represent a growing threat to modern cybersecurity. To address this concern, we present LLM Honeypot, a system designed to monitor autonomous AI hacking agents. By augmenting a standard SSH honeypot with prompt injection and time-based analysis techniques, our framework aims to distinguish LLM agents among all attackers. Over a trial deployment of about three months in a public environment, we collected 8,130,731 hacking attempts and 8 potential AI agents. Our work demonstrates the emergence of AI-driven threats and their current level of us"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.13919","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.13919/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.13919","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383364+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.13919v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383364+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.13919","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383364+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KHROERURZI5N","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383364+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KHROERURZI5NZWTR","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383364+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KHROERUR","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383364+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":7,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21037","citing_title":"Honeyquest for LLMs: Rethinking Cyber Deception for AI Attackers","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04141","citing_title":"Caught in the Act(ivation): Toward Pre-Output and Multi-Turn Detection of Credential Exfiltration by LLM Agents","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27990","citing_title":"AdvancedShelLM: A Stateful Multi-Agent LLM Honeypot for SSH Deception","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28006","citing_title":"Ghost Without Shell: Measuring Non-Interactive SSH Attacks on Honeypots","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18248","citing_title":"Beyond Pattern Matching: Seven Cross-Domain Techniques for Prompt Injection Detection","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.25939","citing_title":"SoK: Honeypots & LLMs, More Than the Sum of Their Parts?","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18248","citing_title":"Beyond Pattern Matching: Seven Cross-Domain Techniques for Prompt Injection Detection","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KHROERUR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KHROERUR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.13919&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KHROERURZI5NZWTR2T2EYJCXCN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383364+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:12:21.383364+00:00"}