{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX","short_pith_number":"pith:KL3CQJUG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"52f6282686977f1f0cdd9c8d36b755c5e7fe802a6e3997917264b1d4182f24d5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.15510","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Joint Decision-Making in Robot Teleoperation: When are Two Heads Better Than One?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.RO"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Clara Colombatto, Duc-An Nguyen, Ingmar Posner, Nick Hawes, Raunak Bhattacharyya, Steve Fleming","submitted_at":"2025-01-28T08:30:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Operators working with robots in safety-critical domains have to make decisions under uncertainty, which remains a challenging problem for a single human operator. An open question is whether two human operators can make better decisions jointly, as compared to a single operator alone. While prior work has shown that two heads are better than one, such studies have been mostly limited to static and passive tasks. We investigate joint decision-making in a dynamic task involving humans teleoperating robots. We conduct a human-subject experiment with $N=100$ participants where each participant pe"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.15510","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2025-01-28T08:30:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.RO"],"title_canon_sha256":"19f3dfce8010ca5128ce8dcbfc0a083c1223b055da81ce38b2ec8621c3904c7c","abstract_canon_sha256":"6c479a8a1cd65a855931f7c94148c9d080287583249716519b9000ab1793320d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.751024Z","signature_b64":"s3OEtJ8+QT2L1V/5cLrkpGBT4thKA3GwgBCsRNZ3Pb2DM6Pc6kUOPMqf0BVsOK85WCzuqGyYNX/T1mDpBnyAAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"52f6282686977f1f0cdd9c8d36b755c5e7fe802a6e3997917264b1d4182f24d5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.749922Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.749922Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Joint Decision-Making in Robot Teleoperation: When are Two Heads Better Than One?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.RO"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Clara Colombatto, Duc-An Nguyen, Ingmar Posner, Nick Hawes, Raunak Bhattacharyya, Steve Fleming","submitted_at":"2025-01-28T08:30:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Operators working with robots in safety-critical domains have to make decisions under uncertainty, which remains a challenging problem for a single human operator. An open question is whether two human operators can make better decisions jointly, as compared to a single operator alone. While prior work has shown that two heads are better than one, such studies have been mostly limited to static and passive tasks. We investigate joint decision-making in a dynamic task involving humans teleoperating robots. We conduct a human-subject experiment with $N=100$ participants where each participant pe"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.15510","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.15510/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.15510","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.750098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.15510v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.750098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.15510","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.750098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KL3CQJUGS57R","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.750098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.750098+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KL3CQJUG","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.750098+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.29693","citing_title":"Measuring the metacognition of AI","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KL3CQJUG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KL3CQJUG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.15510&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KL3CQJUGS57R6DG5TSGTNN2VYX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.750098+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:51.750098+00:00"}