{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1997:KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA","short_pith_number":"pith:KLQNXBNB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"52e0db85a1927fe48fad2b0f414cb28001a35b11ca8b4bc2c96af35e993938ea","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-th/9710009","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why is the Matrix Model Correct?","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Nathan Seiberg","submitted_at":"1997-10-01T21:28:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the compactification of M theory on a light-like circle as a limit of a compactification on a small spatial circle boosted by a large amount. Assuming that the compactification on a small spatial circle is weakly coupled type IIA theory, we derive Susskind's conjecture that M theory compactified on a light-like circle is given by the finite $N$ version of the Matrix model of Banks, Fischler, Shenker and Susskind. This point of view provides a uniform derivation of the Matrix model for M theory compactified on a transverse torus $T^p$ for $p=0,...,5$ and clarifies the difficulties f"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-th/9710009","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"1997-10-01T21:28:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"9e7bf12bed0dc3773256e02a9bb9a883199acd16fc2125edc9b822d62539808f","abstract_canon_sha256":"c40d5a781e1e7702941059a054c7341d9668bbd64487b38e975d2d4a68cec7b5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478967Z","signature_b64":"EU+p2KCO346M8awBl56Fg1gPJ4x/896gTtkj+/+HQL0TAJTqmA4/IqZihjptYSpw6QP2yNGjGDiN6P0cXx6MAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"52e0db85a1927fe48fad2b0f414cb28001a35b11ca8b4bc2c96af35e993938ea","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478595Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478595Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why is the Matrix Model Correct?","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Nathan Seiberg","submitted_at":"1997-10-01T21:28:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the compactification of M theory on a light-like circle as a limit of a compactification on a small spatial circle boosted by a large amount. Assuming that the compactification on a small spatial circle is weakly coupled type IIA theory, we derive Susskind's conjecture that M theory compactified on a light-like circle is given by the finite $N$ version of the Matrix model of Banks, Fischler, Shenker and Susskind. This point of view provides a uniform derivation of the Matrix model for M theory compactified on a transverse torus $T^p$ for $p=0,...,5$ and clarifies the difficulties f"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-th/9710009","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-th/9710009/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-th/9710009","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-th/9710009v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9710009","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KLQNXBNBSJ76","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5N","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KLQNXBNB","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478658+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27359","citing_title":"Wilson coefficients from a non-renormalization theorem in 2D SYM","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2311.10565","citing_title":"Worldsheet Formalism for Decoupling Limits in String Theory","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11051","citing_title":"Uni-vector deformations, D0-bound states and DLCQ","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"hep-th/9711200","citing_title":"The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KLQNXBNB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KLQNXBNB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-th/9710009&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KLQNXBNBSJ76JD5NFMHUCTFSQA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478658+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:49:42.478658+00:00"}