{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2013:KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN","short_pith_number":"pith:KOKUANAC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"53954034026506acf0358074f07222336a85e91faa10c687c20401c3cd7e284a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1304.4164","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Axiomatizing first-order consequences in independence logic","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Miika Hannula","submitted_at":"2013-04-15T16:48:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Independence logic cannot be effectively axiomatized. However, first-order consequences of independence logic sentences can be axiomatized. In this article we give an explicit axiomatization and prove that it is complete in this sense. The proof is a generalization of the similar result for dependence logic."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1304.4164","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2013-04-15T16:48:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"0fd38ec14c1cb1a4df6c9221a5eb5d2e2fd3b20cf8beb3bde50fd14ac6794e68","abstract_canon_sha256":"f04b6c15213e0c7bf45ada69cd356ffb97333d5f0c9f56e465ee0ca7dfb1ac96"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:30:26.085478Z","signature_b64":"iI78R+lYUxR6Gf90ZiNxh0P4NxbsBwzlCg8a/n2NrbbX4jjGjG1P4P+3+i3cHFecja0Vn0ldoET/d8p7JYnTDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"53954034026506acf0358074f07222336a85e91faa10c687c20401c3cd7e284a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:30:26.084771Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:30:26.084771Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Axiomatizing first-order consequences in independence logic","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Miika Hannula","submitted_at":"2013-04-15T16:48:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Independence logic cannot be effectively axiomatized. However, first-order consequences of independence logic sentences can be axiomatized. In this article we give an explicit axiomatization and prove that it is complete in this sense. The proof is a generalization of the similar result for dependence logic."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1304.4164","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1304.4164","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:30:26.084890+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1304.4164v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:30:26.084890+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1304.4164","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:30:26.084890+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KOKUANACMUDK","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:51.066281+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KOKUANACMUDKZ4BV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:51.066281+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KOKUANAC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:51.066281+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KOKUANAC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KOKUANAC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1304.4164&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KOKUANACMUDKZ4BVQB2PA4RCGN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:30:26.084890+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:30:26.084890+00:00"}