{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH","short_pith_number":"pith:KQYPEZNP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5430f265afb81505e6b7a65e38d0d1b9f354a2aaad6d312170da284b061cb692","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.24783","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Paired comparison models with strength-dependent ties and order effects","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Mark E. Glickman","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T16:45:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Paired comparison models, such as the Bradley-Terry (1952) model and its variants, are commonly used to measure competitor strength in games and sports. Extensions have been proposed to account for order effects (e.g., home-field advantage) as well as the possibility of a tie as a separate outcome, but such models are rarely adopted in practice due to poor fit with actual data. We propose a novel paired comparison model that accounts not only for ties and order effects, but recognizes two phenomena that are not addressed with commonly used models. First, the probability of a tie may be greater"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.24783","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T16:45:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d6762b7eb67bb426d0a6721da2f9693d137c3391d350594f3adc8207c6ab2bf8","abstract_canon_sha256":"4f35bf16d35df730e4fff81d7b0837cad3a81c4943a465a9f7f2bd1346078d72"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.567452Z","signature_b64":"rzdarn8U0dmjM+iw+8kZk3iOuJDSrzu+LLCvZn8+8nPTpnWbgbyZaX+eFMV1UKP/TOQN99cKrEs1X1UYnGzeAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5430f265afb81505e6b7a65e38d0d1b9f354a2aaad6d312170da284b061cb692","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566932Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566932Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Paired comparison models with strength-dependent ties and order effects","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Mark E. Glickman","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T16:45:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Paired comparison models, such as the Bradley-Terry (1952) model and its variants, are commonly used to measure competitor strength in games and sports. Extensions have been proposed to account for order effects (e.g., home-field advantage) as well as the possibility of a tie as a separate outcome, but such models are rarely adopted in practice due to poor fit with actual data. We propose a novel paired comparison model that accounts not only for ties and order effects, but recognizes two phenomena that are not addressed with commonly used models. First, the probability of a tie may be greater"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.24783","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.24783/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.24783","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.24783v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.24783","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KQYPEZNPXAKQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KQYPEZNP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566997+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03840","citing_title":"New insights into Elo algorithm for practitioners and statisticians","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KQYPEZNP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KQYPEZNP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.24783&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KQYPEZNPXAKQLZVXUZPDRUGRXH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566997+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:12:56.566997+00:00"}