{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7","short_pith_number":"pith:KSN5ERVM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"549bd246ac1dc23728bad44fd2c4f107f7994bcf4033d548cd52fc2221d2cc5c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.10243","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Safety Blind Spot in Remote Driving: Considerations for Risk Assessment of Connection Loss Fallback Strategies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SY"],"primary_cat":"eess.SY","authors_text":"Leon Johann Brettin, Markus Maurer, Niklas Braun, Robert Graubohm","submitted_at":"2025-02-14T15:53:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"As part of the overall goal of driverless road vehicles, remote driving is a major emerging field of research of its own. Current remote driving concepts for public road traffic often establish a fallback strategy of immediate braking to a standstill in the event of a connection loss. This may seem like the most logical option when human control of the vehicle is lost. However, our simulation results from hundreds of scenarios based on naturalistic traffic scenes indicate high collision rates for any immediate substantial deceleration to a standstill in urban settings. We show that such a fall"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.10243","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"eess.SY","submitted_at":"2025-02-14T15:53:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SY"],"title_canon_sha256":"9b1615a1da4fb75692108caebd2b69ea3157f4dbfff89945ec92110104cd113d","abstract_canon_sha256":"f3e57bcbf62a5088ae05eafe0635024abe58a71f349f9974b51c62e76787320d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521745Z","signature_b64":"/+0GQwF15BR8jOh5u2kOLhUQez3lqMmug3sOPZqqUwpzuuui81arGjrXA2BS1vgvz1IRT9yM5zBjomuEgnbTCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"549bd246ac1dc23728bad44fd2c4f107f7994bcf4033d548cd52fc2221d2cc5c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521234Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521234Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Safety Blind Spot in Remote Driving: Considerations for Risk Assessment of Connection Loss Fallback Strategies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SY"],"primary_cat":"eess.SY","authors_text":"Leon Johann Brettin, Markus Maurer, Niklas Braun, Robert Graubohm","submitted_at":"2025-02-14T15:53:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"As part of the overall goal of driverless road vehicles, remote driving is a major emerging field of research of its own. Current remote driving concepts for public road traffic often establish a fallback strategy of immediate braking to a standstill in the event of a connection loss. This may seem like the most logical option when human control of the vehicle is lost. However, our simulation results from hundreds of scenarios based on naturalistic traffic scenes indicate high collision rates for any immediate substantial deceleration to a standstill in urban settings. We show that such a fall"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.10243","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.10243/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.10243","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521298+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.10243v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521298+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.10243","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521298+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KSN5ERVMDXBD","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521298+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521298+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KSN5ERVM","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521298+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.29818","citing_title":"Teleoperation Operational Design Domain based on Minimal Risk Maneuver Capability","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KSN5ERVM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KSN5ERVM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.10243&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KSN5ERVMDXBDOKF22RH5FRHRA7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521298+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:14:30.521298+00:00"}