{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA","short_pith_number":"pith:KUIF43SI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"55105e6e482285cf4e3b44d76833ca5007c689dac67944d878a1d586f7fbc60f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.05358","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Debate-Feedback: A Multi-Agent Framework for Efficient Legal Judgment Prediction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Haotian Shangguan, Mao Mao, Shuo Li, Xi Chen","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T09:34:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"The use of AI in legal analysis and prediction (LegalAI) has gained widespread attention, with past research focusing on retrieval-based methods and fine-tuning large models. However, these approaches often require large datasets and underutilize the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs). In this paper, inspired by the debate phase of real courtroom trials, we propose a novel legal judgment prediction model based on the Debate-Feedback architecture, which integrates LLM multi-agent debate and reliability evaluation models. Unlike traditional methods, our model achieves significan"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.05358","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T09:34:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"195f2c0ca66b713a281fd1192435ad07dc39fd41515e85fd81d06a9caac6843a","abstract_canon_sha256":"b83778f0e83123f4184061f4ac7817c966caf539f8f35989d59eeb7b17e4fa82"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.036177Z","signature_b64":"uImUzBfUjan8RVKn/JCg2W1z0Hqyqp/fqYlg+RdSz0f5agpI6Pcwhdlt58eIbgLPY2aKiA1jD79N31HnDelxCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"55105e6e482285cf4e3b44d76833ca5007c689dac67944d878a1d586f7fbc60f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035654Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035654Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Debate-Feedback: A Multi-Agent Framework for Efficient Legal Judgment Prediction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Haotian Shangguan, Mao Mao, Shuo Li, Xi Chen","submitted_at":"2025-04-07T09:34:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"The use of AI in legal analysis and prediction (LegalAI) has gained widespread attention, with past research focusing on retrieval-based methods and fine-tuning large models. However, these approaches often require large datasets and underutilize the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs). In this paper, inspired by the debate phase of real courtroom trials, we propose a novel legal judgment prediction model based on the Debate-Feedback architecture, which integrates LLM multi-agent debate and reliability evaluation models. Unlike traditional methods, our model achieves significan"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.05358","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.05358/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.05358","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035717+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.05358v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035717+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.05358","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035717+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KUIF43SIEKC4","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035717+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KUIF43SIEKC46TR3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035717+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KUIF43SI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035717+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.18768","citing_title":"ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KUIF43SI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KUIF43SI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.05358&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KUIF43SIEKC46TR3ITLWQM6KKA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035717+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:45:41.035717+00:00"}