{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA","short_pith_number":"pith:KVDMWLVV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5546cb2eb5848c0c5ce9b220b88d7e70343dcbd714f0237b2135b91f019be751","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2107.06963","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Increasing Faithfulness in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue with Controllable Features","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"David Reitter, Dipanjan Das, Gaurav Singh Tomar, Hannah Rashkin","submitted_at":"2021-07-14T19:52:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Knowledge-grounded dialogue systems are intended to convey information that is based on evidence provided in a given source text. We discuss the challenges of training a generative neural dialogue model for such systems that is controlled to stay faithful to the evidence. Existing datasets contain a mix of conversational responses that are faithful to selected evidence as well as more subjective or chit-chat style responses. We propose different evaluation measures to disentangle these different styles of responses by quantifying the informativeness and objectivity. At training time, additiona"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2107.06963","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2021-07-14T19:52:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"636182928b1ceedbc2faf8a27f57a4aa485c8a7afccd03df137553c8a15088be","abstract_canon_sha256":"f5eb52e274081087e0540729c0c5cb532601508a0bfcaf5dea8c4ce73f5efd1c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678861Z","signature_b64":"izCNl0wQV8xS4nZJ6HcYv//ZS7AuecNFWHThwPOKrA4lylkJG9KNjIXOHjvRZV6OXPKFvi3YuuVFeVFzYQPuDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5546cb2eb5848c0c5ce9b220b88d7e70343dcbd714f0237b2135b91f019be751","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678405Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678405Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Increasing Faithfulness in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue with Controllable Features","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"David Reitter, Dipanjan Das, Gaurav Singh Tomar, Hannah Rashkin","submitted_at":"2021-07-14T19:52:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Knowledge-grounded dialogue systems are intended to convey information that is based on evidence provided in a given source text. We discuss the challenges of training a generative neural dialogue model for such systems that is controlled to stay faithful to the evidence. Existing datasets contain a mix of conversational responses that are faithful to selected evidence as well as more subjective or chit-chat style responses. We propose different evaluation measures to disentangle these different styles of responses by quantifying the informativeness and objectivity. At training time, additiona"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2107.06963","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2107.06963/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2107.06963","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678464+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2107.06963v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678464+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2107.06963","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678464+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KVDMWLVVQSGA","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678464+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678464+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KVDMWLVV","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678464+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2308.05374","citing_title":"Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KVDMWLVV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KVDMWLVV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2107.06963&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KVDMWLVVQSGAYXHJWIQLRDL6OA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678464+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:58:08.678464+00:00"}