{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ","short_pith_number":"pith:KX7EO6V2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"55fe477aba65f6b4e5f70f7c38e52f441c61cc6241301cb9f0ce00e44018d065","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2108.00783","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Gjergji Kasneci, Johannes van den Heuvel, Martin Pawelczyk, Sascha Bielawski, Tobias Richter","submitted_at":"2021-08-02T11:00:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Counterfactual explanations provide means for prescriptive model explanations by suggesting actionable feature changes (e.g., increase income) that allow individuals to achieve favorable outcomes in the future (e.g., insurance approval). Choosing an appropriate method is a crucial aspect for meaningful counterfactual explanations. As documented in recent reviews, there exists a quickly growing literature with available methods. Yet, in the absence of widely available opensource implementations, the decision in favor of certain models is primarily based on what is readily available. Going forwa"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2108.00783","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2021-08-02T11:00:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"1eb6db61f05ea4012c090ec8a22e79252e15bca833f659d841c990f26be2bdc3","abstract_canon_sha256":"3268d572effd4e635df36453f5a7b4266177896d295c10ccff0acadeeb82c48d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772754Z","signature_b64":"W1cddvSFkONOGF09JXlAQ17cSlk9SI6BwhC4qQS9HEXzpxmP5iZmHC+xPDWvz71o4Vq/0kYHAekIktiXkZNMAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"55fe477aba65f6b4e5f70f7c38e52f441c61cc6241301cb9f0ce00e44018d065","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772115Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772115Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Gjergji Kasneci, Johannes van den Heuvel, Martin Pawelczyk, Sascha Bielawski, Tobias Richter","submitted_at":"2021-08-02T11:00:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Counterfactual explanations provide means for prescriptive model explanations by suggesting actionable feature changes (e.g., increase income) that allow individuals to achieve favorable outcomes in the future (e.g., insurance approval). Choosing an appropriate method is a crucial aspect for meaningful counterfactual explanations. As documented in recent reviews, there exists a quickly growing literature with available methods. Yet, in the absence of widely available opensource implementations, the decision in favor of certain models is primarily based on what is readily available. Going forwa"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2108.00783","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2108.00783/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2108.00783","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772188+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2108.00783v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772188+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2108.00783","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772188+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KX7EO6V2MX3L","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772188+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPX","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772188+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KX7EO6V2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772188+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.18832","citing_title":"Target-confidence Recourse Using tSeTlin machines: TRUST","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12701","citing_title":"Do Fair Models Reason Fairly? Counterfactual Explanation Consistency for Procedural Fairness in Credit Decisions","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KX7EO6V2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KX7EO6V2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2108.00783&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KX7EO6V2MX3LJZPXB56DRZJPIQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772188+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:25:26.772188+00:00"}