{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH","short_pith_number":"pith:KZ4SA7JV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5679207d352be996f276c7324bd2bfb1f8e983a8fee121a4e68d96df2fe952f9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.13884","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Multi-LLM Debiasing Framework","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Deonna M. Owens, Franck Dernoncourt, Hanieh Deilamsalehy, Jiuxiang Gu, Nedim Lipka, Ruiyi Zhang, Ryan A. Rossi, Sungchul Kim, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen","submitted_at":"2024-09-20T20:24:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools with the potential to benefit society immensely, yet, they have demonstrated biases that perpetuate societal inequalities. Despite significant advancements in bias mitigation techniques using data augmentation, zero-shot prompting, and model fine-tuning, biases continuously persist, including subtle biases that may elude human detection. Recent research has shown a growing interest in multi-LLM approaches, which have been demonstrated to be effective in improving the quality of reasoning and factuality in LLMs. Building on this approach, we propo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.13884","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-09-20T20:24:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"b0a0b0f6f004f67c1cd2a2bdb5116902be6098bfd59567cb8c31c55fb24e57c7","abstract_canon_sha256":"de570127992feef8e9c1c8d826988fd8a90fc715af11eac4b23b9e927329f8e1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.139143Z","signature_b64":"gQifGp7zHP/10llltiRVevKRzuNfAyFqLS+i9M1gYPXtHJ988Um6t9GwoeJq1W+fQiLo2dXMrEgEqt4NMxLjAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5679207d352be996f276c7324bd2bfb1f8e983a8fee121a4e68d96df2fe952f9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138702Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138702Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Multi-LLM Debiasing Framework","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Deonna M. Owens, Franck Dernoncourt, Hanieh Deilamsalehy, Jiuxiang Gu, Nedim Lipka, Ruiyi Zhang, Ryan A. Rossi, Sungchul Kim, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen","submitted_at":"2024-09-20T20:24:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools with the potential to benefit society immensely, yet, they have demonstrated biases that perpetuate societal inequalities. Despite significant advancements in bias mitigation techniques using data augmentation, zero-shot prompting, and model fine-tuning, biases continuously persist, including subtle biases that may elude human detection. Recent research has shown a growing interest in multi-LLM approaches, which have been demonstrated to be effective in improving the quality of reasoning and factuality in LLMs. Building on this approach, we propo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.13884","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.13884/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.13884","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.13884v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.13884","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"KZ4SA7JVFPUZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TW","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"KZ4SA7JV","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138760+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21296","citing_title":"Discriminatory Compliance: How LLMs Answer Queries from Protected Groups","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.02181","citing_title":"A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning","ref_index":149,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.23213","citing_title":"Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16315","citing_title":"Be a Partner, not a Bystander in Software Engineering Practice: Bridging the Gaps between Academia and Industry","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.05579","citing_title":"LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods","ref_index":173,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KZ4SA7JV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/KZ4SA7JV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.13884&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/KZ4SA7JVFPUZN4TWY4ZEXUV7WH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138760+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:10:08.138760+00:00"}