{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF","short_pith_number":"pith:L253KUEC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"5ebbb550827080b8749b52b502abda896748e38a9cdeb126eeec08ac9b163d9c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1406.2855","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Common Structure of Paradoxes in Aggregation Theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Umberto Grandi","submitted_at":"2014-06-11T10:32:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper we analyse some of the classical paradoxes in Social Choice Theory (namely, the Condorcet paradox, the discursive dilemma, the Ostrogorski paradox and the multiple election paradox) using a general framework for the study of aggregation problems called binary aggregation with integrity constraints. We provide a definition of paradox that is general enough to account for the four cases mentioned, and identify a common structure in the syntactic properties of the rationality assumptions that lie behind such paradoxes. We generalise this observation by providing a full characterisat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1406.2855","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2014-06-11T10:32:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"f906243b858a94573d8805c23f58453c7d430492c9cc766ebb3eabcc3ffba97f","abstract_canon_sha256":"668633fc6c8272a6a9e8eda5d45219998a68d7c74d9b8856afe55b5c1c9974e6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:54.894630Z","signature_b64":"GZV5On3QJGmO5fIM0SNzsnHQf8H3FpYNrVSsGn05XnZxULcOFNW3W9KJMHkYsc7XAlQcAk95PqlZ9dMogFNABg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"5ebbb550827080b8749b52b502abda896748e38a9cdeb126eeec08ac9b163d9c","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:54.894038Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:54.894038Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Common Structure of Paradoxes in Aggregation Theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Umberto Grandi","submitted_at":"2014-06-11T10:32:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper we analyse some of the classical paradoxes in Social Choice Theory (namely, the Condorcet paradox, the discursive dilemma, the Ostrogorski paradox and the multiple election paradox) using a general framework for the study of aggregation problems called binary aggregation with integrity constraints. We provide a definition of paradox that is general enough to account for the four cases mentioned, and identify a common structure in the syntactic properties of the rationality assumptions that lie behind such paradoxes. We generalise this observation by providing a full characterisat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1406.2855","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1406.2855","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:54.894112+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1406.2855v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:54.894112+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1406.2855","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:54.894112+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"L253KUECOCAL","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:35.611951+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"L253KUECOCALQ5E3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:35.611951+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"L253KUEC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:35.611951+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L253KUEC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/L253KUEC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1406.2855&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/L253KUECOCALQ5E3KK2QFK62RF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:54.894112+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:54.894112+00:00"}